Sharp Limits on L.A. MMJ Businesses Approved
function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('Sharp Limits on L.A. MMJ Businesses Approved');
 site = new Array(5);
 return false;

Sharp Limits on L.A. MMJ Businesses Approved
Posted by CN Staff on May 22, 2013 at 17:11:02 PT
 By Kate Linthicum
Source: Los Angeles Times
Los Angeles -- A ballot measure to sharply limit the number of medical marijuana dispensaries in the Los Angeles was approved by voters Tuesday night. The measure won with 62% of the vote, according to the latest results.Proposition D would reduce the number of pot shops in the city from about 700 now to about 130 by allowing only those that opened before the adoption of a failed 2007 city moratorium on new dispensaries to remain open. A rival initiative, Measure F, which would have allowed an unlimited number of dispensaries to operate, failed. Both measures would raise taxes on medical marijuana sales 20%.
Yami Bolanos, a Proposition D supporter who opened PureLife Alternative Wellness Center in 2006, cried with happiness as the first election results came in, saying she felt as though years of uncertainty about the future of medical marijuana in the city were coming to an end. "Voters had the heart to stand up for the patients like the city council never did," Bolanos said.City Councilman Bill Rosendahl, a cancer patient and medical marijuana user who backed Proposition D, said the measure "takes us out of chaos." He said the dispensaries that have been in the city since 2007 have showed that they are good actors. "They have lived with us," he said.Backers of Measure F, which called for additional regulations on dispensaries such as city audits and tests of cannabis for toxins, said they weren't ready to give up.David Welch, an attorney who supported that measure, said he was prepared to sue if Proposition D was declared the winner. He said the proposition was unconstitutional because it favored dispensaries based on an arbitrary date. He also predicted that Proposition D would be difficult to enforce, saying that many shops that opened after 2007 probably would continue to operate until the city identifies them and orders them closed. "The city has no idea who qualifies and who doesn't," Welch said.The contentious campaign over how to regulate medical marijuana shops divided the city's dispensaries, employees and customers, as well as the city council.Measure F supporters warned that Proposition D would create a monopoly for older shops and allow the rise of "pot superstores." Backers of Proposition D, including a coalition of older shops and a labor union that has organized workers at many of them, cautioned that Measure F could lead to thousands of new dispensaries.A third measure, Initiative Ordinance E, would have permitted only the older shops to remain open but without raising taxes. It was put on the ballot by a coalition of older shops and the dispensary employees union, but that coalition shifted its support to Proposition D after the city council voted to put that measure on the ballot.The stakes were raised this month when the California Supreme Court upheld the right of cities to ban dispensaries.Supporters of both initiatives warned that if voters failed to pass one of the ballot measures, the city would be left with no law regulating medical marijuana and might be tempted to enact a total ban.The city council attempted such a ban last year, voting 14 to 0 to outlaw over-the-counter sales of marijuana while allowing small groups of patients to grow the drug for their own use. It reversed the action after the coalition of older dispensaries and union workers qualified a measure for the ballot that would have repealed the ban.At least one city council member, Jose Huizar, has spoken of revisiting the ban now that cities have been given the authority to outlaw dispensaries.L.A. has struggled for years to regulate dispensaries, in large part because of contradictory court rulings. The city is battling more than 60 lawsuits over its earlier attempts at regulation.Los Angeles voters have generally supported the availability of medical marijuana.In 1996, California became the first state to legalize the medicinal use of pot, although subsequent state laws failed to make explicit how the drug should be distributed. In 2011, L.A. voters approved a ballot measure to tax sales.Still, a USC Price/Los Angeles Times poll conducted this month found strong support for more regulation of pot shops, with 61% of respondents saying they felt the city should regulate dispensaries more than it currently does. In contrast, 13% said the city should regulate less, and 19% said regulation should not change.The poll also found that 54% of voters supported a 20% tax increase on medical marijuana sales and 33% opposed it.Many voters confessed to confusion over the differences among the ballot measures. "The pot stuff was hard," said Sue Maberry, 64, of Silver Lake. She voted yes on Measure F because she believed Proposition D would create a monopoly.Early returns also suggested voters favored a measure aimed at overturning Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court ruling that corporations and unions have a 1st Amendment right to spend their money to influence voters.The measure would "instruct" members of Congress from the Los Angeles area to support a constitutional amendment to change the law, although the lawmakers would not be bound by it.Source: Los Angeles Times (CA)Author: Kate LinthicumPublished: May 22, 2013Copyright: 2013 Los Angeles TimesContact: letters latimes.comWebsite:  Medical Marijuana Archives 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help 

Comment #3 posted by Hope on May 23, 2013 at 12:03:35 PT
It's wrong. It's an injustice.
What about the beloved capitalism? Why shouldn't the stores all be allowed to open, compete, and fail, if necessary? If there are too many... competition will thin them out. That's how capitalism works, isn't it? This is pure meddling, dictatorial, and unjust.Busybodies are such a burden on the rest of humanity.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by anomalies on May 22, 2013 at 19:31:31 PT:
While they are at it, what about cigarettes, alcohol sugar and caffeine. I don't get it. Just because there are more people willing to vote against this, who are they to tell someone that they can't open a business? If they don't like it, just don't shop there.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by Sam Adams on May 22, 2013 at 18:21:08 PT
you wanna know why all our jobs have gone to Asia and the govt. is in massive debt? This is why, it's nearly impossible to open and run a business
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment