Plan To Cash In on Marijuana Farms Hits Roadblock
function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('Plan To Cash In on Marijuana Farms Hits Roadblock');
 site = new Array(5);
 return false;

Plan To Cash In on Marijuana Farms Hits Roadblock
Posted by CN Staff on March 03, 2011 at 07:28:39 PT
By Malia Wollan
Source: New York Times
Oakland, CA -- For a brief, smoky moment last fall, this economically challenged city seemed poised to become the nation’s most aggressive when it comes to growing and taxing medical marijuana. Those hopes have been dimmed considerably in recent weeks, though, since an exchange of letters between the city attorney and federal law enforcement officials has made it exceedingly clear that Washington will not tolerate plans for the large-scale marijuana farms the City Council approved last July. City officials had hoped to use the massive indoor growing facilities to raise some $38 million annually in fees and taxes at a time when the city is struggling with a $31 million deficit and 17 percent unemployment.
Polls last summer suggested that voters were likely to pass a November ballot initiative that would have legalized recreational marijuana use in California. They did not. But Oakland decided to proceed with its plans anyway. Hundreds of well-heeled investors and would-be farmers poured in from across the country to vie for four cultivation permits. Then, in December, just weeks before the city was set to issue the permits, the Council voted to stall the plan after the city’s attorney, John Russo, and a county district attorney warned the Council that the marijuana cultivation ordinance thwarted state law and that city officials could be held criminally liable. On Jan. 14, Mr. Russo wrote a letter to the United States Department of Justice seeking guidance on the city’s legal standing. In a response, Melinda Haag, United States attorney for the Northern District of California, warned that “individuals who elect to operate ‘industrial cannabis cultivation and manufacturing facilities’ will be doing so in violation of federal law.” The letter went on to say that the Justice Department was “carefully considering civil and criminal legal remedies regarding those who seek to set up industrial marijuana growing warehouses.” Mr. Russo has refused to provide further legal guidance to the city on the marijuana farm issue, forcing Oakland to hire a new legal team as they consider a revised version of the ordinance. Desley Brooks, the council member who wrote the revised ordinance, said the city had little choice but to move ahead with large marijuana farms. “There are unregulated grow operations in the city, and we’re having fires, home invasions and crime as a result,” she said. Ms. Brooks puts much of the blame for the legal hoopla over the ordinance on Mr. Russo. “Our city attorney went to the feds and invited scrutiny,” she said. State law restricts who can grow marijuana to medical marijuana patients and their “primary caregivers,” ruling out the type of stand-alone marijuana farms originally proposed by the city. Ms. Brooks’s revised ordinance couples the farms together with a storefront dispensary that acts as “primary caregiver.” “Oakland is the epicenter of medical marijuana in the United States,” said Allen St. Pierre, executive director for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. “The Department of Justice is paying closer attention in Oakland because they’re mindful of the fact that there is enough political and commercial chutzpah to actually get this done. The only thing stopping these entrepreneurs from breaking ground tomorrow is this letter from the feds.” When the city gave the green light to industrial-scale marijuana cultivation, an eclectic group of investors stepped forward. Among dozens of groups who spent months and hundreds of thousands of dollars on business plans, consultants and architects was Ben Bronfman, an heir to the Seagram liquor fortune and fiancé of the rapper M.I.A. Mr. Bronfman leased 11 acres of land by the airport where he and partners had hoped to install enormous greenhouses that would produce environmentally friendly marijuana using a massive, experimental carbon-capturing device. “Cannabis is a more constructive thing to have in our society than alcohol,” he said. Jeff Wilcox, a former commercial real estate developer turned medical marijuana advocate, was one of the first in line for a cultivation permit. He spent $120,000 and two years developing a $20 million plan to transform a 172,000-square-foot office park he owns into a high-tech facility capable of growing 23 pounds of medical marijuana a day, an annual crop worth up to $58 million. In accordance with city rules, much of that money would have been turned back into city coffers and into nonprofit organizations. Many of the investors who flocked to Oakland are now taking their money and their marijuana know-how elsewhere. “I applaud the city for pushing the envelope, but it’s frustrating for those of us who spent a lot of time and money on this process,” said Derek Peterson, a former Wall Street banker turned marijuana entrepreneur who spent $80,000 on his permit application. Mr. Peterson is not waiting around for the city to make a decision. Fourteen states and the District of Columbia now have medical marijuana laws on the books, providing ample opportunity to grow and distribute marijuana on a huge scale. Mr. Peterson is applying for a permit to do just that in Arizona. “Right now Oakland is far too visible for this kind of investment,” said Scott Hawkins, who worked as a consultant on a permit application on behalf of Richard Lee, the founder of Oaksterdam University, a medical marijuana trade school here. “Investors don’t want to risk their capital in this situation unless things can get worked out between the City Council and the Department of Justice and the city attorney’s office.” A version of this article appeared in print on March 3, 2011, on page A16 of the New York edition.Source: New York Times (NY)Author: Malia WollanPublished: March 3, 2011Copyright: 2011 The New York Times CompanyContact: letters nytimes.comWebsite: Medical Marijuana Archives
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help 

Comment #3 posted by Sam Adams on March 03, 2011 at 14:55:09 PT
happy news toking
Strong majorities for drug reformFeb 10th 2011 | from the print editionTHIS week’s Economist-YouGov poll contains some exciting news for devotees of the weed. A huge majority of Americans, more than two to one once don’t knows have been excluded, support the legalisation and taxation of marijuana. Even without excluding the don’t knows, a clear majority favours treating the drug equivalently to tobacco and alcohol.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by ekim on March 03, 2011 at 11:43:25 PT
no mention of Gov't efforts to eliminate bad laws 
which are stopping job creation.please Author: Malia Wollan do a follow up peice on how cannabis prohibition in its totality - the medicinal - recreational - and industral use of this plant as a whole which has hundreds of uses. The USA is starting to lead the rest of the world in the Med use of the plant but fall far short by many years
in the industral use of the cannabis plant.Do a little research on Hemp bills in Illinois and CA and see how many times they have gone thru both house and senate only to be vetoed by the Govs. Arnold of CA was the last.Mean while we spend billions on eradication of dichweed 
and keep our students from learning how valuable this plant is to over 30 countries of the world. keeps trying to do the right thing. They’ve gotten close on medical marijuana a couple of times in the legislature, but couldn’t quite close the deal (there’s no referendum process in Illinois).Yesterday, the House Agriculture and Conservation committee passed the Illinois Industrial Hemp Act 11-2. Next, it goes to the full house. (Hemp is defined in the bill as having a THC content below 0.3%) please see the comments on this story.
The Laboratory's two R&D 100 Awards for 2004 are for an innovative, lower-cost method for transforming plant material into the sugars that can be used to make fuels and chemicals,
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by dongenero on March 03, 2011 at 08:25:38 PT
No! You can't raise $38 million annually in fees and taxes with marijuana (not to mention create jobs) but, can lay off your teachers, end arts and sports programs and stop teaching the children in an effort to save money (while destroying jobs, income, taxes and our childrens' education).You can also take away Americans collective bargaining rights and try to save money there (while destroying jobs and income).Figure it out. However, tax cuts for the wealthy are highly recommended.
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment