Judge To Decide Validity of Case Against Advocate

Judge To Decide Validity of Case Against Advocate
Posted by CN Staff on March 03, 2007 at 16:53:45 PT
By Carolyn Marshall
Source: New York Times 
San Francisco -- A federal judge has asked the United States attorney here to submit all trial preparation memorandums in the case against a leading advocate of medical marijuana so that the court can determine if the government has been pursuing a “vindictive prosecution.” The judge, Charles R. Breyer, ordered the review at the request of lawyers for Ed Rosenthal, a spokesman in the effort to legalize marijuana who has been in a closely watched court battle with the government.
At a motion hearing in Federal District Court here on Friday, defense lawyers for Mr. Rosenthal urged Judge Breyer to dismiss an array of federal drug, money laundering and tax evasion charges against their client, saying an appellate court judge had overturned his conviction in a nearly identical case last year.The new charges, outlined in a federal grand jury indictment issued in October, accuse Mr. Rosenthal of 14 felonies, including conspiracy to grow and sell marijuana for medical use, laundering $1,850 and failing to report income from the sale of crop plants on his tax returns.The overall charges are nearly identical to a 2003 federal case against Mr. Rosenthal, which ended with a one-day prison sentence after members of the jury disavowed the verdict, having learned belatedly that Mr. Rosenthal was growing marijuana under Proposition 215, the state’s medical marijuana law. “We are outraged that the prosecutor continues to pursue this case,” said Shari L. Greenberger, a lawyer for Mr. Rosenthal. “The vindictive nature of the prosecutor is clear-cut and utterly shocking.”Despite the short sentence in the 2003 case, Mr. Rosenthal challenged the fairness of his trial, and in April, a federal judge with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the marijuana growing conviction, citing jury misconduct. The decision punctuated a contentious three-year volley of legal appeals and cross complaints that were given a second wind on Friday, with the start of the new case.The United States attorney, George Beven, declined to answer questions about the case, citing an office policy. But at Friday’s hearing he agreed to provide Judge Breyer with all interoffice memorandums pertaining to his office’s decision to seek another trial and expanded charges.The federal government has continued to come down hard on medical marijuana advocates in the state. A spokesman for the United States attorney’s office, Luke Macaulay, has said previously that federal law supersedes state law. Though Proposition 215 was overwhelmingly approved by voters in 1996, under federal law, marijuana is illegal.“This is really about a collision between state and federal law,” said Douglas Horngrad, a defense lawyer for many advocates of medical marijuana. Judge Breyer has promised to rule on the motion to dismiss within the week. But he signaled in court on Friday that the case would probably proceed in some form, because he intended to review the new evidence only in relation to some of the 14 felony charges.“If I did grant the defense motion” Judge Breyer said, “I probably would only grant it in relation to the money laundering and tax evasion.”Mr. Rosenthal, an author and columnist, would face no more than a one-day jail sentence if convicted on the marijuana charges, per an agreement the prosecutor made with the court.Complete Title: Judge To Decide Validity of Case Against Marijuana Advocate Source: New York Times (NY)Author: Carolyn MarshallPublished: March 4, 2007Copyright: 2007 The New York Times CompanyContact: letters nytimes.comWebsite: Articles & Web Site:Ed Rosenthal's Pictures & Articles Guru Pleads Not Guilty Advocate Faces New U.S. Indictment
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help

Comment #3 posted by doc james on March 04, 2007 at 08:13:55 PT
the truth about marihuana
has been spoken from Ed's mouth and the powers that be want to get a get-back for him getting off the last charges he had against him so it is just plain harrassment at it's highest form, the bastards.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by John Tyler on March 04, 2007 at 07:35:31 PT
harassment again
This is just harassment. They are trying to wear him down, and break him financially and emotionally. Ed is a high profile person expressing his point of view and the Fed doesn’t like it one bit. They want to suppress him. Think of all the time and money and effort wasted to suppress this plant and those that use it. Is this insane or what?
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by Dr Ganj on March 03, 2007 at 22:58:45 PT
Will It Ever End?
Imagine all the time & money being spent on this case!
Now, consider what this is all about- a plant. A little green plant that makes people feel better.
Now, think of all the mayhem, and real crime out there, and our federal prosecutors opt instead to pursue felony charges for growing cannabis plants. This my friends, is a prime example why this country is so thoroughly rotten.
People will look back on these times, and will be astonished our society did this to its own citizens.
It's truly disgusting, and I pray I live long enough to see the end of this destructive war-on-people for growing/using marijuana. 
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment