Let States, Doctors Decide

Let States, Doctors Decide
Posted by CN Staff on May 11, 2005 at 16:24:50 PT
By Paul Armentano
Source: Washington Examiner
Washington, D.C. -- Imagine there was a nontoxic medication available that provided symptomatic relief for a litany of serious and life-threatening diseases, including cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis. Imagine that thousands of ill Americans were successfully using this medicine under the supervision of their physician. Now imagine that the US government was withholding this medication and threatening to incarcerate those patients who benefit from its use.
We don't have to imagine such a scenario. The medicine is cannabis, and for those tens of thousands of Americans who use it therapeutically, Washington's recalcitrance on this issue is a grim reality.Fortunately, this attitude may be changing. US Representatives Barney Frank, D-Mass., Sam Farr, D-Calif., Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y., Ron Paul, R-Tex. and Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif. sponsored bi-partisan legislation this week to provide for the medical use of cannabis in accordance with the laws of various states. The bill, HR 2087, would reclassify marijuana under federal law to recognize its medical utility and enable physicians to legally prescribe it under controlled circumstances.Most importantly, this legislation would afford patients legal protection under federal law by rescheduling marijuana from a Schedule I (criminally prohibited drug) to a Schedule II (prescription-only substance) and permit those states that wish to establish medical marijuana distribution systems the legal authority to do so. Congressional passage of this legislation is long overdue.Since 1996, voters and legislatures in 11 states have passed laws exempting patients who use cannabis under a physician's supervision from state criminal penalties. These laws do not legalize the recreational use of marijuana; they merely provide a narrow exemption from state prosecution for defined patients who possess and use medical cannabis under their doctor's supervision. So far, available evidence indicates that these laws are functioning as voters intended and abuses are minimal.As the success of these statewide campaigns suggest, the American public clearly distinguishes between the medical use and the recreational use of cannabis and a large majority support legalizing medical use for seriously ill patients. A CNN/Time Magazine poll found that 80 percent of Americans support making marijuana legally available for doctors to prescribe. Similar support has been demonstrated among both Democrat and Republican voters in every state and nationwide poll that has been conducted on the issue since 1996. Arguably, few other policy issues share the unequivocal support of the American public as this one.The medical community is also solidly behind the medicinal access to marijuana. According to a recent national survey of US physicians conducted for the American Society of Addiction Medicine, nearly half of all doctors with an opinion on the subject support legalizing marijuana as a medicine. Moreover, more than 80 state and national health care organizations, including the American Nurses Association, American Public Health Association and The New England Journal of Medicine, support immediate, legal patient access to medical cannabis.Inexplicably, the federal government has responded to this reality by threatening doctors with arrest, prosecuting seriously ill patients and stonewalling research of cannabis' medicinal value. This federal obfuscation must come to an end.House Bill 2087 is not a mandate from Washington and does not require any state to amend its current laws. It is a states' rights bill that reflects the will of the American people as well as the scientific and medical communities and would allow states to determine for themselves whether cannabis should be legal for medicinal use. It is a common sense solution to a complex issue and deserves Congressional hearings and support. For those thousands of seriously ill patients who rely on the medicinal use of cannabis, it is unconscionable for Congress to do otherwise.Paul Armentano is the senior policy analyst for the NORML Foundation in Washington, DC.Newshawk: Paul ArmentanoSource: Washington Examiner (DC)Author: Paul ArmentanoAuthor: Wednesday, May 11, 2005Copyright: 2005 Washington ExaminerContact: threads dcexaminer.comWebsite: Articles & Web Site:NORML Advocates Play It Straight in D.C. Pot Bill Shields 10 States Marijuana Advocates Implore Congress
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help

Comment #1 posted by AgaetisByrjun on May 12, 2005 at 13:37:02 PT
This newspaper...
The Washington Examiner is a free newspaper that I actually got delivered today (as did everyone in my neighborhood). This could actually get pretty wide distribution, unlike similar articles from Reason or Counter Punch.Only beef is the "recreational use = bad" stigma, but that'll change when they realize that the sky isn't going to fall with legal medical marijuana.
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment