Cannabis News Marijuana Policy Project
  Marijuana Crops Raided
Posted by FoM on August 28, 2000 at 12:36:51 PT
By Heidi Bell Gease & Hugh O'Gara 
Source: Rapid City Journal  

DEA Industrial-hemp plants were being raised for building project.

Pine Ridge, SD; Federal agents seized thousands of marijuana plants growing at two industrial-hemp test plots on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation early Thursday morning.

For 1,000 or more plants, punishment upon conviction is 10 years to life in prison. No arrests were made, but grand-jury indictments are expected. Alex White Plume was awakened at 6 a.m. Thursday by the sound of a helicopter.

Outside his home near Manderson, about 25 armed agents from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), U.S. Marshals Service, and Northern Plains Safe Trails Drug Task Force were preparing to confiscate the industrial-hemp crop White Plume had tended since last spring.

The plants were to have been used for building materials. A group called the Slim Buttes Land-Use Association has been building a house from industrial hemp.

Agents reportedly cut and hauled away 3,782 plants in moving trucks from White Plume's 1.5-acre test plot. A second 50-foot square plot near Slim Buttes, which was marked with a sign reading, "Oglala Sioux Tribe Department of Agriculture experimental plot," was also raided Thursday.

"It's a sad day," White Plume said Thursday. "We really put a lot of time and energy into these plants... I'm just trying to calculate how much money (the federal government) wasted on weeds."

The Slim Buttes Land-Use Association has worked for several years to establish industrial-hemp as a reservation crop. It grows in poor conditions and can be used to make fabric, paper, rope, and other items.

Hemp is not smoked like some marijuana. It's low in tertrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive ingredient that gives a "high."

In 1998, the Oglala Sioux Tribal Council passed an ordinance legalizing industrial-hemp with 1 percent or less THC. Members of the Slim Buttes group say their plants tested well below that level.

A 1937 U.S. law banned marijuana, but hemp supporters say that law was aimed at the drug, not at the industrial product. Hemp production was actually encouraged by the U.S. government during World War II.

But federal law doesn't address THC, which hadn't been identified in 1937. Federal officials say marijuana is marijuana, and it's all illegal under federal law (although industrial hemp can be imported).

"The growing of any marijuana plant is illegal unless the SEA issues a permit after enforcing appropriate safeguards against the misuse of the plants," U.S. Attorney Ted McBride said in a news release Thursday.

Among requirements for a DEA permit is a state law regulating hemp. A bill to let South Dakota farmers raise hemp was killed in the Legislature last February.

According to search warrant papers filed in U.S. District Court, Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) criminal investigator Colin Clarke was told in June that White Plume was growing marijuana near Manderson.

On June 8, Clarke did aerial surveillance over White Plume's home and spotted the marijuana field.

White Plume and the Slim Buttes group were purposely above-board and open about their hemp operations. On July 18, White Plume asked tribal law-enforcement officers to come to his home to view the growing operation.

He also asked that sample plants be sent for analysis to verify that they contained less than 1 percent THC, as required under tribal ordinance.

That day, Clarke went to White Plume's home where he saw marijuana plants ranging from 4 feet tall to 10 feet tall. With White Plume's consent, he pulled one of the plants and sent it to the University of Mississippi.

The analysis could detect no THC in the plant.

White Plume also told Clarke he had been trying to grow hemp for three years. The first crop didn't sprout, and last year's crop grew to about 18 inches before dying. Youngsters stole a portion of his current crop, he said.

Slim Buttes Project Director Tom Cook and project spokesman Joe American Horse said they expected Thursday's raid to happen.

"They think we're doing something illegal, but we're not really. It's just and ordinary plant," American Horse said. "We're not promoting drugs."

"We're willing to get arrested," Cook said, to bring the issue to light.

"We've got clean records otherwise."

He said he has a problem with the DEA interpreting the 1937 law to include all marijuana. "My concern is that when the police make the laws, then by definition you have a police state," he said. "And that's repugnant to our Constitution and all Americans."

White Plume said federal officials told him they weren't making any arrests because they "didn't want to get into a political controversy."

"We're just in a state of shock." he said, adding that he planned to harvest the plants next week. "We're doing something that's allowed by our tribal government, which has sovereign power on the reservation."

All three men said the raid wouldn't stop the hemp project but would only set it back.

"We're not going to stop what we're doing," White Plume said. "We think what we're doing is saving the world. So we're not going to give up."

Contact Heidi Bell Gease at 394-8469 or at:
Contact Hugh O'Gara at 394-8415, or at: hugh_o'

Transcribed from a fax by D. Paul Stanford.

Newshawk: HempTV
Pubdate: Fri, 25 Aug 2000
Source: Rapid City Journal (SD)
Copyright: 2000 The Rapid City Journal
Authors: Heidi Bell Gease and Hugh O'Gara

CannabisNews Hemp Archives:

Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

Comment #4 posted by Jocelyn on August 30, 2000 at 22:05:30 PT
What the &*%!
That is so stupid that the pigs are messing with these people who aren't doing anything but growing some hemp. Well, I didn't read all of it but I read half and from what I read, that was messed up. Sorry just wanted to stress the fact that weed and especially hemp, are not bad. They help and heal.

[ Post Comment ]
Comment #3 posted by Libertarian on August 28, 2000 at 18:29:28 PT
Vote for Harry Browne


[ Post Comment ]
Comment #2 posted by freedom fighter on August 28, 2000 at 16:32:08 PT
I'll second that!
I also want congress to find out just how much money these folks got in their bank accounts. Im willing to bet that 80% of the DEA have more money than they could possibly earn as agents. Follow the money!

[ Post Comment ]
Comment #1 posted by legalizeit on August 28, 2000 at 14:52:48 PT
Abolish the DEA
what a total wast of government $$$... the gov. says they can do it, then these thugs take the law into their own hands and harass innocent Indians.

For the racist government, it's business as usual.

>He said he has a problem with the DEA interpreting the 1937 law to include all marijuana. "My concern is that when the police make the laws, then by definition you have a police state," he said. "And that's repugnant to our Constitution and all Americans."

Unfortunately, it's not repugnant to ALL Americans - just those with their heads on straight (or those who don't have some sort of vested interest in the issue.)

>"We're not going to stop what we're doing," White Plume said. "We think what we're doing is saving the world. So we're not going to give up."

Saving the world from a non-psychoactive plant with thousande of uses. Really lofty.

I have a better idea for saving the world: Disband the DEA, ONDCP, US Marshals, FBI, BATF and all other jack-booted federal police agencies that we are involuntarily wasting our tax dollars on. Leave drug laws and policing up to the states and their voters for a change.

[ Post Comment ]

  Post Comment

Name:       Optional Password:


Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:

Return to Main Menu

So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on August 28, 2000 at 12:36:51