cannabisnews.com: A Setback for Medipot





A Setback for Medipot
Posted by FoM on May 21, 2001 at 18:16:41 PT
By Margot Roosevelt - Los Angeles
Source: CNN AllPolitics
Sales were strong at 7494 Santa Monica Boulevard last week. Prices were neatly posted; customers paid by credit card; computers tracked inventory; a Better Business Bureau plaque gleamed behind the counter. On the lounge TV, a video showed Los Angeles County Sheriff Leroy Baca praising the place: "A great success...things are done properly and people who need services are getting those services." But the success and services of the Los Angeles Cannabis Resource Center and similar medical-marijuana distributors across the country could soon be history. 
Last week the U.S. Supreme Court in a unanimous decision declared that illness is no excuse for legalizing marijuana--not even to ease the suffering of patients with cancer, AIDS or other life-threatening diseases. The folks on Santa Monica Boulevard, however respectable, are committing a federal crime as they collect baggies of Maude's Mighty Moss ("large and luscious reddish green buds, easy to break and roll," $18 a gram) and Adobe ("compressed green bud, fresh and tasty, with seeds and stems," $4 a gram). The court's foray into the medipot conflict did little to resolve the highly politicized issue. Justice Clarence Thomas' opinion was narrow. It affirmed the government's power to shut down a cannabis cooperative in Oakland, Calif., but stopped short of invalidating laws passed by nine states allowing marijuana for medical use. Thomas' opinion skirted the states'-rights issue at the heart of the case--does California have the right to legalize medipot?--and a concurring opinion from three liberal Justices, led by John Paul Stevens, chided the conservative majority for "overbroad language...given the importance of showing respect for sovereign states." Stevens also suggested that while medical necessity can't be invoked by a mass distributor, it might still be a defense against prosecution of an individual--"a seriously ill patient for whom there is no other means of avoiding starvation or extraordinary suffering." That's a good description of the 880 members of the Los Angeles cooperative, three-quarters of whom have AIDS. The rest suffer from cancer, multiple sclerosis or other diseases, and all have marijuana prescriptions fromm licensed physicians. Leanne Orgen, 46, an insurance broker with liver cancer, buys pot-laced chocolate-chunk brownies--a "miracle drug" for chemotherapy-induced nausea, she says. Jeffrey Farrington, 32, who has glaucoma, explains that if he stops smoking marijuana, which relieves ocular pressure, he loses more than 7 ft. of vision daily. "If they shut us down," he says, "I'll go blind and I'll watch my friends die of AIDS." Two years ago, the Institute of Medicine concluded that marijuana has potential therapeutic value. Polls show nearly three-quarters of Americans favor medical-marijuana use, and juries are increasingly reluctant to convict sick people for possession. Oregon, Alaska and Hawaii have set up state registries for medipot users; Colorado, California, Nevada and Maine are debating similar moves. Such grassroots enthusiasm carries little weight with drug warriors, who dispute the scientific data and argue that marijuana leads to hard narcotics. In an interview with TIME last week, Attorney General John Ashcroft praised the Supreme Court decision. "We can't function well as a country if each state makes its own rules about what's available health-care-wise," he argued. "If Congress wants to exempt various people from the laws of this country, it's their duty." That's unlikely. But neither the Justice Department nor the DEA has said whether the court ruling will cause them to mount a new offensive against medical-marijuana clinics. And as a practical matter, most individual pot infractions fall under state and local jurisdiction, and an increasing number of local law-enforcement officers are refusing to prosecute medipot cases. Still, Scott Imler, president of the L.A. center and an epileptic who smokes weed to control his seizures, fears the worst. "If they march in here with storm troopers and seize the building, I can't imagine it would be politically popular," he says. "But maybe they don't care." Note: After a Supreme Court decision, distributors of medical marijuana fear a federal shutdown.With reporting by Elaine Shannon - WashingtonSource: CNN (US)Author: Margot Roosevelt - Los AngelesPublished: May 28, 2001Copyright: 2001 Cable News Network, Inc.Contact: cnn.feedback cnn.comWebsite: http://www.cnn.com/Related Articles & Web Sites:Los Angeles Cannabis Resource Centerhttp://www.lacbc.org/OCBC Versus The U.S. Government News http://www.freedomtoexhale.com/mj.htmCannabisNews Medical Marijuana Archiveshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/list/medical.shtml
END SNIP -->
Snipped
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #3 posted by Doug on May 22, 2001 at 09:19:55 PT:
Pyrrhic victory
The headline here says "Setback for Medipot" and certainly there has been much doom and gloom about this Supreme Court ruling. But the decision has given the topic of medical marijuana a real burst of publicity, more than even Prop 215 garnered. And so many editorials are coming out about the folly of the decision, from all over the nation. There is now a push to get Congress to change the law.The "problem" with medical marijuana is that once the cat is out of the bag, it is extremely difficult to get her back in. The more people are aware of the amazing properties of this herb -- and here I think the testimonies of actual patients will carry much more weight than doctors -- the more they will consider trying it for themselves or loved ones when the need arises.Once the SC took this case, they lost, because however they ruled, and I think the decision was a foregone conclusion, the publicity would be would be great. It would have been smarter for the SC to refuse the case, but of course that would have left the lower court ruling standing, which was not desirable to the government.So as I said, it was a Pyrrhic victory: win the battle, lose the war. 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by freedom fighter on May 21, 2001 at 23:19:39 PT
I refuse to be 
part of this..Sick people should never have to fear their own government..If we want to call ourselves human beings... , we had betterget our country to understand that Sick people had ought todo just what they want to do..Otherwise, our country is no longer a country.. God havemercy on this country..\/ff
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by FoM on May 21, 2001 at 20:46:02 PT:
Also in Time Magazine!
Hi Everyone,The above article is also in Time Magazine so I'm posting the link and contact information too.A Setback for MedipotSource: Time Magazine (US) Author: Margot Roosevelt - Los AngelesPublished: May 28, 2001 VOL. 157 NO. 21Copyright: 2001 Time Inc. Contact: letters time.com Website: http://www.time.com/time/ http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101010528-127236,00.html
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment


Name: Optional Password: 
E-Mail: 
Subject: 
Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]
Link URL: 
Link Title: