cannabisnews.com: Supreme Court Questions Medical Marijuana Use Supreme Court Questions Medical Marijuana Use Posted by FoM on March 28, 2001 at 16:23:48 PT By James Vicini Source: Reuters With the federal government warning against creating "marijuana pharmacies," a number of Supreme Court justices expressed reservations on Wednesday about allowing marijuana to be given to patients who prove cannabis was medically necessary.In a major medical marijuana case involving a California cannabis club, the justices appeared sympathetic to the government's argument that patients may not get marijuana as a "medical necessity" because it has been classified as an illegal drug under federal law. The hour-long hearing marked a watershed for the U.S. medical marijuana movement, which has been mired in legal battles ever since California in 1996 approved the nation's first initiative legalizing medicinal use of the drug.U.S. Justice Department lawyer Barbara Underwood criticized a U.S. appeals court ruling for allowing marijuana clubs in California to distribute the drug to those who prove cannabis was medically necessary.She said the ruling "allows the operation of marijuana pharmacies."Underwood said federal agencies had not established that marijuana was medically useful. In fact, she said agencies had established the drug has a high potential for abuse and alternative pain relievers exist, including the synthetic form of marijuana's active ingredient.Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg asked about examples of sick patients, such as a man with cancer who was constantly vomiting and benefited from using marijuana. "Am I wrong in thinking there has been quite a bit of this going on?" she asked.Several justices asked Underwood why the Justice Department did not simply bring criminal charges against the club, instead of the civil lawsuit seeking an injunction to stop it from distributing marijuana.Chief Justice William Rehnquist asked Gerald Uelmen, the lawyer for the Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, whether there was any other case in which the Supreme Court has recognized the "medical necessity defense."Uelmen admitted no other case existed, prompting Rehnquist to remark that Congress ruled out that defense when it placed marijuana on the listed of illegal drugs under the federal law called the Controlled Substances Act.Rehnquist Asks How Ill A Person Must be To Use Marijuana:Rehnquist asked how serious the medical condition must be to justify use of marijuana, saying cannabis did not save lives, but only eased a person's pain and provided comfort.Uelmen said marijuana may be provided to seriously ill patients facing "imminent harm," such as death, starvation or going blind.Justice Anthony Kennedy disagreed with Uelmen's argument that it would create only a very narrow exception for medical marijuana use. "It doesn't sound limited to me at all," he said. "That's a huge rewrite of the statute."Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said the U.S. appeals court "appeared to create a blanket exception to the Controlled Substances Act."Justice Antonin Scalia told Uelmen the defense can be raised by an individual, not by "someone who opens up a business to provide illegal drugs to those who need it."Under questioning from Scalia, Uelmen said the defense could apply to use of other illegal drugs by sick patients.Scalia called it an "easy gamble" for the patient. "A jury versus the grim reaper. I'll take the jury any day," he said.The court will issue its ruling by the end of June. Source: ReutersAuthor: James ViciniPublished: March 28, 2001Copyright: 2001 ReutersRelated Articles & Web Sites:Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Co-op: http://www.rxcbc.org/USA V. OCBC & Jeffrey Jones: http://www.druglibrary.org/ocbc/CannabisNews Medical Marijuana Archives: http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/medical.shtml Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help Comment #2 posted by The GCW on March 29, 2001 at 06:45:05 PT: From the Holy Spirit of Truth. In plant form, Cannabis is God. [ Post Comment ] Comment #1 posted by The GCW on March 29, 2001 at 05:56:52 PT: From the Holy Spirit of Truth! With cannabis you don’t need leaders. The 2%ers know full well that an end to the cannabis prohibition hampers them from every single direction. While the 90% today in the polls show the non-oppressive understanding, there will not be allowed the option of cannabis for it divides their wealth, which is nonconforming to their desire of greed. When we look at all plant implications, we see that there is what we do not know. What we do know is enlightening enough to help become aware of what we did not know. Example: We know our understanding of our relationship w/plants under the context of taste and eat: that is we know what is best to taste and eating and that includes what is the worst, what will kill you if you eat it. We know our understanding of our relationship w/plants under the context of touch and its implications including what plants we touch that heal, and heal best along with what plants irritate us and cause rash implicating wicked. What about the plant for smell implications? We are told by God and we know from the Holy Spirit of Truth that the smell implication of cannabis / kaneh bosm, is amongst good and Love. We know that you can not smell too much where other plants that we know are good to smell do not allow the full spectrum of smell to be had because they are not the best smells and may be one of the smells that kill. Cannabis is the Greatest smell our Lord gave us. Cannabis is the greatest taste and food given us. Cannabis is the greatest thing that you touch to your body. Cannabis likewise will show true to other similar applications. So are you of the crowd that consists of the 2% that represents greed. Greed is the mark of wicked evil. Truth is the mark of the God Awesome! [ Post Comment ] Post Comment Name: Optional Password: E-Mail: Subject: Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message] Link URL: Link Title: