cannabisnews.com: Jail Us or Leave Us Alone, Say Cannabis Users Jail Us or Leave Us Alone, Say Cannabis Users Posted by FoM on February 11, 2001 at 12:39:41 PT By Anthony Browne, The Observer Source: Guardian Unlimited Cannabis activists are asking to be prosecuted for possession of the drug in an extraordinary bid to break down the laws on prohibition. The move follows a wave of optimism in the cannabis legalisation movement, which supporters see as akin to the civil rights campaigns that led to the legalisation of homosexuality and women's right to vote. For the first time in Britain, cannabis campaigners will stand in a general election, fielding up to 100 candidates. The police and Crown Prosecution Service have become increasingly unwilling to prosecute for possession of cannabis. Juries now routinely acquit users who plead innocent on the grounds of medical necessity. Rather than take people to court, police are issuing cautions, which last week the Government announced would no longer mean carrying a criminal record for life. However, activists are demanding to be prosecuted so that they can plead innocent under the new Human Rights Act, which prevents the Government from unduly interfering in the private life of an individual. There are at least half a dozen cases going through the courts where activists have refused cautions and deliberately admitted to using cannabis in order to test the Act. They are confident of victory. Neil Morgan, a cannabis user in south Wales, is being prosecuted for possession after resisting an attempt by police to drop the case. He said: 'Going to court is a golden opportunity - it's the only way we'll change anything. We've waited a long time for this.' The civil rights group Liberty is supporting the case of Jerry Ham, the founder of a homeless charity who is facing prosecution for possession of 3g of the drug. When he was caught by police, Mo Mowlam, the Cabinet Minister in charge of drug enforcement, who knew him through his work, phoned him to offer condolences. Lawyers believe defeat for the Crown Prosecution Service under the Human Rights Act would unravel the drug prohibition laws. The number of CPS prosecutions for possession of cannabis has dropped dramatically, prompting campaigners to accuse it of trying to avoid defeat. Roger Warren-Evans, a barrister on the council of Liberty, said: 'The Crown Prosecution Service know that, for any simple case, it could provoke a human rights defence. They're backpedalling so they don't get caught with a sucker punch on possession. It would unravel all the rest of the prohibition laws.' Daniel Westlake, a 21-year-old building labourer, is thought to be the most likely to bring a change in the law. When caught with a small amount of cannabis, he refused to accept a caution and pleaded not guilty under the Human Rights Act. His case is soon to come before the Court of Appeal, which has the power to declare the Misuse of Drugs Act incompatible with the Human Rights Act. Many police forces have effectively given up enforcing the laws on cannabis possession. Two chief constables, one acting and one retired, have called for its legalisation. A Police Federation report last year called for its decriminalisation, although the Government last week announced it would ignore its recommendations. As a result, campaigners are becoming increasingly open about using and growing the drug. Colin Davies, founder of the Medical Marijuana Co-operative is growing plants in Manchester to supply - illegally - more than 100 people with medical conditions. He has been prosecuted three times, and the jury has acquitted him on each occasion. He is now thinking of importing the drug from mainland Europe. 'I think the juries will be just as sympathetic,' he said. Even social users are openly challenging the police. Mark Gibson, a prospective parliamentary candidate for the Legalise Cannabis Alliance in Cumbria, and a regular user, said: 'There are many more people standing up and being counted. If the police want to arrest me they can, but they don't pay any attention to me any more.' A cannabis rally is being organised in London in May, in full cooperation with the police. A separate march on Downing Street is being planned. Attitudes have changed dramatically both in the UK and abroad. Last year, a third of the Shadow Cabinet admitted to having tried cannabis. Last month, Belgium legalised the drug, following a similar move by Switzerland last year. Portugal, Spain and Italy have all decriminalised possession of cannabis. Holland has officially tolerated the drug for years. Warren-Evans says the Human Rights Act would force Britain to follow Europe: 'The cool neutrality of the courts will get the politicians off the hook. That will happen before the end of the year. The whole apparatus of prohibition will fall.' E-mail: anthony.browne observer.co.uk NewsHawk: RainbowSource: Guardian Unlimited, The (UK) Author: Anthony BrownePublished: Sunday February 11, 2001Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2001Address: 75 Farringdon Road London U.K EC1M 3HQ Fax: 44-171-242-0985 Contact: letters guardian.co.uk Website: http://www.guardianunlimited.co.uk/Related Articles:Special Report: Drugs in Britain http://www.guardian.co.uk/drugs/CannabisNews Articles - U.K.http://cannabisnews.com/thcgi/search.pl?K=UK Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help Comment #6 posted by defenderoffreeworld on February 13, 2001 at 13:38:33 PT: anonymous you really think canada is going to legalize weed just like that, and that the u.s is going to have nothing to say about it? i hope so, but i highly doubt it. [ Post Comment ] Comment #5 posted by Anonymous on February 12, 2001 at 15:43:25 PT tick-tock-tick-tock-tick-tock Once Britain goes, Canada will follow (actually, it might even be a dead heat to see who legalizes first). At any rate, once Canada legalizes, its over for DEAland. [ Post Comment ] Comment #4 posted by Kevin Hebert on February 12, 2001 at 08:28:09 PT: Freedom in the UK What is ironic to me is, the pot-smoking Founders of the United States went to war to gain freedom from Britain, and now they are becoming freer than we are. But, of course, time is on our side. [ Post Comment ] Comment #3 posted by freedom fighter on February 11, 2001 at 18:11:33 PT The wind of change This is a good news. Awesome is a proper word for this. Our time has come. To meagain, if it is okay with you please take the time to register your unique nickname. http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/register.shtml [ Post Comment ] Comment #2 posted by meagain on February 11, 2001 at 13:20:19 PT Awesome 'The cool neutrality of the courts will get the politicians off the hook. That will happen before the end of the year. The whole apparatus of prohibition will fall.' London bridges falling down falling down London bridges falling down falling down my fair lady [ Post Comment ] Comment #1 posted by FoM on February 11, 2001 at 12:46:25 PT: News Brief Give Us a Proper Debate on Cannabis Source: Independent On SundayPublished: February 11, 2001Copyright: 2001 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd. http://www.independent.co.uk/With a general election looming, it was never likely that the Government would react imaginatively to last year's Police Foundation report on drugs. Nevertheless, forced by the Home Affairs select committee to come up with a formal response, last week's reaction was disappointing. Twenty-four of the report's sensible suggestions were rejected. Most notably, the Government refused to consider the reclassification of cannabis, which would have made possession of the drug a non-imprisonable offence; although ministers did at least make some moves to end the stigma of the cautioning process, which currently forces caught-but-cautioned job applicants to 'fess up like convicts. The report's author, Viscountess Runciman of Doxford, was unimpressed by the Government's response to her two years of research. Describing it as "mistaken and complacent", she complained that "this leaves us with a law that is out of touch with reality". She was supported by the Labour MP David Winnick, who said: "Many law-abiding people, who wouldn't dream of flouting the law, nevertheless do take cannabis, don't believe they are criminals, and I believe we simply have to recognise a fact of life." But the laws as they stand do have their uses for the Government, it seems. Speaking on Question Time last week, the Home Office minister Charles Clarke dangled the carrot of marijuana legalisation for medicinal purposes. Cynics might suggest that the Government intends to split the vocal lobby clamouring for Multiple Sclerosis sufferers to be prescribed the (expensive) Beta Interferon, which may alleviate their symptoms, by allowing the use of this (cheap) alternative. We hope that that is unfair. The best way for the Government to prove us wrong would be – once the election is over – to treat the Runciman proposals seriously by initiating a proper debate about the pros and cons of decriminalising cannabis. Related Articles:Special Report: Drugs in Britain http://www.guardian.co.uk/drugs/CannabisNews Articles - U.K.http://cannabisnews.com/thcgi/search.pl?K=UK [ Post Comment ] Post Comment Name: Optional Password: E-Mail: Subject: Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message] Link URL: Link Title: