cannabisnews.com: Reason and Medical Marijuana





Reason and Medical Marijuana
Posted by FoM on January 09, 2001 at 15:13:34 PT
By David J. Casassa
Source: Providence Journal
Congratulations on your honest and level-headed Dec. 16 editorial, "Allow medical marijuana." Unlike some hypocritical politicians and bureaucrats, you have built an argument based on historical and scientific fact, rather than on innuendo. Please allow me, however, to correct some errors. You write that "THC is the active ingredient in marijuana." 
True, THC is the major cannabinoid, but it is just one of dozens of related compounds that occur naturally only in cannabis. Their effects vary: Some are therapeutic, some are euphoric, some are both, and some are neither, so far as we know. Therefore, it is wrong to say that a THC pill is the refined, clean, safe (and patented and expensive) equivalent of raw cannabis. For better or worse, the two will always differ. Your description of the pill as "ersatz" is indeed accurate. "It [cannabis] is a known toxin, and extended use can endanger the lungs, the reproductive system and the immune system. These are among the reasons it was declared illegal in 1937." Your assumption is arguable, depending on method, dosage and duration of use, but your conclusion is simply not supported by the historical record. The byproducts of combustion of any plant matter make frequent, long-term, high-dose smoking of dubious safety, but this is hardly relevant to people who are desperately and/or terminally ill. In any case, alternative methods exist, such as cooking and eating in food. Pure, nonburned cannabis has no known substantial toxicity, making it safer than many common foods, and vastly safer than almost all drugs, both prescription and over the counter. The 1937 law was preceded by brief congressional testimony and debate, in which no credible evidence emerged to justify such a law. In fact, no such evidence existed. Quite to the contrary, the law's primary advocates were self-interested heads of law-enforcement bureaucracies, anxious to create long-term funding and employment for themselves, following the collapse of the alcohol prohibition debacle. In addition, cannabis prohibition served the interests of several powerful industries: alcohol, tobacco, drug, chemical and paper pulp (today, we would add civil forfeiture, prisons, urine-testing and court-ordered rehab to this list). To read the congressional transcripts is to realize that most members of Congress were utterly ignorant of the law's subject matter. With the testimony of fraudulent paid "experts", and with the help of hysterical voices in the media (W.R. Hearst especially), popular sentiments of racial, ethnic, sexual and cultural bigotry were both inflamed and cited as justification for a punitive new law. In short, the purity of our white Anglo-Saxon culture (in particular our women) was allegedly threatened by dope-smoking Mexicans, African-Americans, jazzmen, and other characters seen as suspect by mainstream America. David J. CasassaPittsburgh Source: Providence Journal, The (RI)Author: David J. CasassaPublished: January 9, 2001Copyright: 2001 The Providence Journal CompanyAddress: 75 Fountain St., Providence RI 02902Contact: letters projo.comWebsite: http://www.projo.com/Related Article:Allow Medical Marijuana http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread8022.shtmlCannabisNews Medical Marijuana Archiveshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/list/medical.shtml 
END SNIP -->
Snipped
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Post Comment


Name: Optional Password: 
E-Mail: 
Subject: 
Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]
Link URL: 
Link Title: