cannabisnews.com: Supreme Court Accepts Medical-Marijuana Issue 





Supreme Court Accepts Medical-Marijuana Issue 
Posted by FoM on November 27, 2000 at 08:44:26 PT
By Laurie Asseo, Associated Press Writer
Source: S.F. Gate
 The Supreme Court took on a medical-marijuana dispute Monday, agreeing to decide whether ``medical necessity'' is a defense to the federal law that makes marijuana distribution a crime. The justices said they will hear the Clinton administration's effort to stop a California group from providing the drug to seriously ill patients for pain relief. Congress has decided that marijuana has ``no currently accepted medical use,'' Justice Department lawyers told the justices. 
A lower court decision allowing the Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative to distribute the drug ``threatens the government's ability to enforce the federal drug laws,'' government lawyers added. In August, the Supreme Court put the lower court ruling on hold and barred the California club from distributing marijuana while the government pursued its appeal. Justice Stephen G. Breyer did not participate in the case. His brother, Charles, a federal trial judge in San Francisco, previously barred distribution of marijuana only to have his decision reversed by a federal appeals court. Eight states in addition to California have medical-marijuana laws in place or approved by voters: Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Maine, Oregon, Washington state, Nevada and Colorado. California's law, passed by the voters in 1996, authorizes the possession and use of marijuana for medical purposes upon a doctor's recommendation. The Oakland group said its goal is ``to provide seriously ill patients with safe access to necessary medicine so that these individuals do not have to resort to the streets.'' But the federal Controlled Substances Act includes marijuana among the drugs whose manufacture and distribution are illegal. In January 1998, the federal government filed a lawsuit against the Oakland club, asking a judge to ban it from providing marijuana. Judge Charles Breyer ruled for the government. But the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, saying the government had not disproven the club's evidence that the drug was ``the only effective treatment for a large group of seriously ill individuals.'' Last May, Breyer ruled the Oakland club could provide marijuana to patients who needed it. The government appealed that ruling to the 9th Circuit, which has not yet ruled. In the appeal acted on Monday, Justice Department lawyers said the Supreme Court could grant review now because the 9th Circuit court was not expected to change its decision. That ruling threatens the government's ability to enforce the anti-drug law, Justice Department lawyers said. They said more than two dozen organizations were distributing marijuana for medical purposes in California, Alaska, Hawaii, Oregon and Washington, all in the 9th Circuit. The Oakland club's lawyers said ``the voters of California have spoken'' in approving the medical-marijuana measure. Congress has not explicitly barred a medical necessity defense against the federal anti-drug law, the lawyers added. The case is U.S. v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, 00-151. In other cases Monday, the court: --Agreed to hear an appeal by a condemned killer from Texas whose lawyers say he is mentally retarded and has the reasoning capacity of a 7-year-old. The court said it will use the case of Johnny Paul Penry to clarify how much opportunity jurors in death-penalty cases must have to consider the defendant's mental capacity. --Said it will use a dispute over health care benefits paid to a man injured in a car accident to clarify whether health plans can sue to enforce some requirements. The court said it will hear a California company's argument that it can sue in federal court to force Robert Ellis to give back his health benefits because he later got payment from another source. Ellis received $561,145 from his insurance company but also settled a claim against those responsibile for the auto crash. His health care plan included a requirement that beneficiaries give back their health payments if they later were reimbursed by another source. But Ellis refused to repay the benefits to the health plan. --Turned down a challenge by gambling operators in South Carolina to the state's ban on possession of video gambling machines. The court, without comment, rejected operators' argument that the ban -- which took effect in July when the state outlawed video gambling -- amounted to an unlawful government taking of their property without payment. On the Net: For the appeals court ruling: http://www.uscourts.gov/links.html and click on 9th Circuit. Source: Associated PressPublished: Monday, November 27, 2000 Author: Laurie Asseo, Associated Press Writer©2000 Associated Press Related Articles & Web Site:Oakland Cannabis Buyer's Cooperativehttp://www.rxcbc.org/Official Reefer Madnesshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread6894.shtmlFeds' Needless Pot War http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread6889.shtmlCourt Sends Firm Signal on Marijuanahttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread6886.shtmlMarijuana Distribution Ban Alarms Patientshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread6885.shtml
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #1 posted by Walter Gourlay on November 29, 2000 at 01:36:01 PT:
Marijuana
Congress can say anything they want. The Supreme court can pass anything they want. These two bodies cannot make crooked what is straight or shut out the truth. The fact remains that no government body has the right to deny individuals the right to pursue liberty and happiness. Congress has no moral authority to refute state laws providing those laws do not threaten the country. How the use of medical marijuana or even recreational marijuana threatens the adults and children of this country I'll never know. If parents don't want their kids to use marijuana that's okay. They should tell their kids the same thing they tell their children about alcohol. (I don't think it's good for you and as long as you live in this house you will do what I say or you have to wait until you're 18 before you drink) Unfortunately, many parents are ignorant about marijuana. Instead of telling their childen they don't want them to use marijuana, parents go one step too far when they insist that adults don't have the right to use it, that marijuana is evil and dangerous. What's shaking this country is the intolerance, fear and arrogant contempt for individuals to make their own choices. The Supreme Court cannot impose it's interpretion and Congress cannot enforce it's tyrannical laws on the American people if there is enough defiance. Time will wear these two bodies out. 
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment


Name: Optional Password: 
E-Mail: 
Subject: 
Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]
Link URL: 
Link Title: