cannabisnews.com: Judge Declines to Dismiss Medical Marijuana Suit!





Judge Declines to Dismiss Medical Marijuana Suit!
Posted by FoM on March 11, 1999 at 06:39:27 PT

A federal judge yesterday refused to dismiss a lawsuit that seeks to legalize the medical use of marijuana, ruling that the plaintiffs deserved the chance to prove the government had no reason to deny the drug to seriously ill people.
Plaintiffs seeking to legalize the drug for medicinal use will get their day in federal court. "The answer must come from facts, not the abstractions and dogma presently in the record," wrote U.S. District Judge Marvin Katz in a 25-page opinion and order.Katz's ruling keeps alive a class-action lawsuit that many legal experts assumed had no chance of success when it was filed in July.Justice Department spokesman Brian Steel said lawyers had not had the chance to review Katz's ruling and could not comment. "Our basic position is that marijuana remains an illegal drug," Steel said.Lawrence Elliott Hirsch, the Center City lawyer who filed the suit on behalf of 165 people nationwide, praised the opinion as a "tremendous job of analysis. . . . Whatever the ultimate outcome, the judge has done an excellent job of framing the issues." Some medical researchers have said marijuana seems to help in treating glaucoma and combating the nausea caused by drugs used in treating cancer and AIDS. Although a synthetic form of a key compound of marijuana has been marketed as the prescription drug Marinol, the lawsuit contends it is not as effective as smoking the herb itself.In some ways, Katz handed victories to both sides. He denied Hirsch's motion for a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, and granted the government's motion to dismiss Hirsch's most novel claim -- that, unlike the 18th Amendment's ill-fated ban on alcohol except for medicinal use, Congress prohibited marijuana improperly in the Controlled Substances Act of 1970.Katz wrote that numerous federal courts have upheld the 1970 law.But the judge said it was premature to dismiss the plaintiffs' claim that they were being denied equal protection of the law.Despite the longstanding prohibition of marijuana, the lawsuit contends, the government in 1978 settled a federal lawsuit by implementing a limited "compassionate use" program in which as many as 300 government-grown marijuana cigarettes a month were provided to people found to have serious medical conditions that benefited from marijuana use. About half of the 14 people admitted into the program -- it was closed to new participants in 1992 -- still receive the drug. "The court cannot say," Katz wrote, "that the government's decision to give marijuana to several people who are ill and the government's refusal to give it to the plaintiffs who are also ill is rational as a matter of law when plaintiffs have not had the opportunity to try to prove otherwise."http://www.phillynews.com/inquirer/99/Mar/11/city/POT11.htm
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #1 posted by Dr. Ganj on March 11, 1999 at 12:36:40 PT
Class action lawsuit
Finally a judge that will be objective! Let us hope he seesthrough the government's deceit, and recognizes the truth of the plaintiffs, and rules accordingly. Good always prevails, although many times it takes longer than expected.Dr. Ganj
http://www.maps.org
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment


Name: Optional Password: 
E-Mail: 
Subject: 
Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]
Link URL: 
Link Title: