cannabisnews.com: Judge Hints He Will Modify MMJ Injunction Judge Hints He Will Modify MMJ Injunction Posted by FoM on July 14, 2000 at 16:50:41 PT By Christine Hanley, Associated Press Writer Source: SF Gate A federal judge hinted he may be forced to allow an Oakland club to distribute marijuana for medicinal purposes because the government hasn't proven that seriously ill patients should be denied the drug. During a brief hearing Friday, U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer indicated he would have little other choice since the government didn't offer any new arguments why it would not be in the public's interest to exempt some patients from federal narcotics laws. Breyer noted that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal found the government had not yet rebutted evidence that cannabis is the only effective treatment for a large group of seriously ill individuals, and directed him to rethink a 1998 injunction he issued. ``I see no reason why I would not modify the injunction,'' Breyer said, interjecting wry explanations of how he was just following orders of the appeals court. ``I don't see that there's an issue for me to decide here ...The record today is the same as when it went to the 9th Circuit.'' Breyer indicated he would rule on the matter on Monday. U.S. Justice Department spokeswoman Gretchen Michael said officials would have no comment until they an order is issued. Annette P. Carnegie, one of the attorneys representing the Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, and Jeffrey Jones, the owner of the club and the lead defendant, said they are cautiously optimistic the judge will rule in their favor. ``We're on pins and needles,'' Carnegie said, acknowledging she expected the government, should it lose its case, would petition the U.S. Supreme Court for a hearing. The development came the same day the city of San Francisco announced a new program to hand out ID cards to patients who -- with doctors' permission -- can legally obtain marijuana. Until Breyer issues an official ruling, it is unclear how narrow or broad the ramifications will be in a complex case that addresses the conflict between California's medical marijuana initiative, passed in 1996 as Proposition 215, and federal narcotics regulations. Proposition 215 allows seriously ill patients to grow and use marijuana for pain relief, with a doctor's recommendation, without being prosecuted under state law. Advocates say only marijuana can make certain treatments for AIDS and cancer bearable, and ease pain from glaucoma and other conditions. But federal law says marijuana has no medical purpose and cannot be administered safely under medical supervision. And in that vein, the Justice Department sued the Oakland Cannabis club and six others in Northern California to try and shut them down. Breyer issued an injunction in May 1998 prohibiting the clubs from distributing marijuana while the lawsuit was pending, prompting three of the clubs to close. But last September, the 9th Circuit appeals court told Breyer to reconsider keeping the injunction in force as originally written, finding the Oakland club showed ample evidence that there are patients who face imminent harm without the drug and have no effective legal alternative. ``The evidence in the record is sufficient to justify the requested modification,'' the appellate court ruled. By Christine Hanley, Associated Press WriterSan Francisco (AP) Published: Friday, July 14, 2000 ©2000 Associated Press Related Articles & Web Site:Oakland Cannabis Buyer's Cooperativehttp://www.rxcbc.org/index.htmlStudy Finds Pot Safe for AIDS Patientshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread6390.shtmlStudy Finds Marijuana Use Safe for HIV Patients http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread6383.shtmlStudy Finds Pot Use Safe for HIV Patientshttp://www.examiner.com/000713/0713aids.htmlCircuit Rules in Favor of Pot Users http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread5712.shtmlCannabisNews Medical Marijuana Archives: http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/medical.shtml Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help Comment #1 posted by dddd on July 15, 2000 at 04:33:44 PT Yes I like to think of drugwar managers reading this,and scurrying about to try and nip this in the bud,(no pun intended);,,"During a brief hearing Friday, U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer indicated he would havelittle other choice since the government didn't offer any new arguments why it would not be inthe public's interest to exempt some patients from federal narcotics laws." This is well stated by Judge Breyer. "Breyer noted that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal found the government had not yetrebutted evidence that cannabis is the only effective treatment for a large group of seriously ill individuals, anddirected him to rethink a 1998 injunction he issued. It's gonna be quite akward for anyone to attempt a rebuttal against people like my friend Keith,who is a quadrapalegic.Marijuana is by far,the best thing he has found to control the spasticity in his legs.His doctor at the VA hospital tried numerous "legal" drugs to control the spasms,but they were either ineffective,or they were just various forms of sleeping pills. How can you argue with a guy,who is a quadrapalegic,who says,"Smoking marijuana brings almost instant relief from spasticity in my legs." His doctor agrees,and so do the voters in California . Why would anyone want to debate the issue???Who are these people who would? The "hinting"from this judge,is a harbinger of a robust and eminent exposure of the absurd and distorted attempts,by a small group of evil people,to justify the insanity of the drugwar. This is going to be a remarkable year in politics...........dddd [ Post Comment ] Post Comment Name: Optional Password: E-Mail: Subject: Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message] Link URL: Link Title: