cannabisnews.com: The Dope on Medical Marijuana





The Dope on Medical Marijuana
Posted by FoM on May 30, 2000 at 10:06:34 PT
By Lila Guterman 
Source: The Chronicle
Despite its many potential benefits, the drug has been the subject of few clinical trials.Legend has it that the Chinese Emperor Shen Nung discovered the medicinal properties of marijuana almost 5,000 years ago, observing that it was not only psychoactive but useful for pain control. 
A physician in ancient Greece, Dioscorides, noted that cannabis could treat pain, rheumatism, and gout. Queen Victoria's physician recommended it for insomnia, migraines, menstrual cramps, and muscle spasms. One neurologist estimates that today, perhaps as many as 50,000 Americans with multiple sclerosis illegally smoke marijuana to alleviate their symptoms. Despite such historical and anecdotal reports of marijuana's medical benefits, scientists say far more research needs to be done before the drug can be considered a viable treatment. Yet governmental reviewers have all but shut down clinical trials, basing their decisions on politics rather than science, some researchers charge. Some scientists interested in studying medical marijuana say they won't bother to apply to hold clinical trials because of the difficulty of obtaining federal approval. Indeed, today, only one clinical trial of the plant's medical effects is under way in the United States, involving fewer than 70 volunteers. By contrast, the government permitted 21 clinical trials involving more than 3,000 men in the years leading up to Viagra's approval in 1998. "The government is much more interested in preserving the purity of its ideology than it is in allowing patients to get effective medicine," says Ethan B. Russo, a neurologist at Western Montana Clinic, who has been denied access to the National Institute on Drug Abuse's supply of marijuana, the only legal source in the country. "I think it's a moralistic stance rather than a scientifically based one," Dr. Russo says. But Steven W. Gust, the special assistant to the director of the drug-abuse institute, says that's not true. "There seems to be a consensus of opinion [among scientists] that more research should be done," he says. "It's just a matter of getting it done." Dr. Russo, who is also an adjunct associate professor at the University of Montana, has been submitting proposals to study marijuana's effects on migraine headaches since 1997, without success. Most recently, despite unanimous approval from the review board of the Missoula hospital where he hoped to conduct his study, and approval from the Food and Drug Administration last year, the drug-abuse institute rejected his proposal to use federal supplies of marijuana."The criticisms indicated that [the federal reviewers had] a poor understanding of issues with cannabis and migraines," he says. Dr. Russo and others insist that more research on marijuana's possible health benefits is important not only because legalized medicinal cannabis could relieve symptoms for patients who have little other recourse, but also because the many ailing people who already smoke marijuana for its medical benefits need better information about its effects. It hasn't always been so hard to study the plant. Research, including six trials run by state public-health departments to look at marijuana's effectiveness in staving off nausea caused by chemotherapy, was done as recently as the 1970's and early 1980's -- before the government's war on drugs kicked into high gear. More research is needed, say proponents, because the state studies were never published and some of them failed to compare cannabis to a placebo or make sure that all trial participants had the same medical conditions. However, those studies and others did suggest that marijuana or other drugs containing cannabinoids, marijuana's major psychoactive ingredients, could treat a number of conditions, according to a report published last year by the Institute of Medicine, an independent organization that studies health issues that have implications for federal policies. The report concluded that cannabinoids can relieve pain, reduce vomiting, and stimulate appetite in people with diseases, such as AIDS, that cause them to lose weight. It found the data on marijuana's effectiveness for treating muscle spasticity, as in multiple sclerosis, only "moderately promising," and was less encouraging about its use to treat glaucoma, epilepsy, and movement disorders such as Huntington's and Parkinson's diseases. No matter how effective it is, smoked marijuana is unlikely to be approved as a medicine in the United States. Public resistance -- reflected in Al Gore's recent waffling on the issue, despite his sister's having tried the drug when she was fighting lung cancer -- is based in part on longstanding social concerns. Legalization of medical marijuana, goes one popular theory, might open the door to recreational use. It could even lead people to more harmful substances like cocaine or heroin, a claim that published research on drug use casts into doubt, says Janet E. Joy, director of the Institute of Medicine's study. Other concerns about marijuana use are grounded in physiology. It has long been known that cannabis interferes with cognition, at least in the short term, so that people under the influence should not drive cars, for example. Smoking it also causes the heart to beat faster for a few hours, which could cause problems for people with heart disease. But Ms. Joy dismissed some other physiological objections. The possibility that users could become dependent is "well within the risks we already tolerate" with other medicines, she said. And claims that marijuana suppresses the immune system are "not well established." The strongest objection to marijuana is that it is smoked. "There's no F.D.A.-approved product, to my knowledge, that's delivered in a smoked form," says Mr. Gust, of the National Institute on Drug Abuse. As with tobacco, smoking marijuana can damage the lungs. In fact, marijuana cigarettes generate more tar than tobacco cigarettes, and marijuana smokers exacerbate the problem by holding their breath longer. However, no studies have directly linked smoking marijuana to cancer. Lung disease is a concern for people who would be using marijuana long-term to fight chronic illness. For patients with terminal diseases, though, "the medical benefits of smoked marijuana might outweigh the harm," says the Institute of Medicine report. Still, a nonsmoked medication stands a much better chance of being accepted by the medical establishment and approved by the government. The Food and Drug Administration has approved one such drug for appetite stimulation and relief of vomiting in AIDS and cancer patients. The drug, Marinol, comes as pills that contain tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, the main psychoactive component of marijuana. Marinol does not satisfy all proponents of medical marijuana, however. They say that the way the body receives the drug can, in many cases, make it less effective. Keeping a pill down can be difficult or impossible for patients with severe nausea. And it takes hours for Marinol to take effect, whereas with smoked marijuana's instant hit of cannabinoids in the bloodstream, patients can monitor their own dose and simply stop smoking when they feel their symptoms receding. Some activists say Marinol has become an obstacle to studying marijuana. "The federal government was able to stall progress on the medical-marijuana issue for almost a decade simply by approving the THC pill in 1986," says Chuck Thomas, the director of communications at the Marijuana Policy Project, a Washington-based lobbying organization. Others blame the 1980's Just Say No movement and the rise of government opposition to drugs. Whatever the reason, running a clinical trial to test marijuana's medical properties in humans has become a Herculean labor, as the experience of Donald I. Abrams demonstrates. An AIDS specialist at the University of California at San Francisco, Dr. Abrams is the only researcher in the United States currently doing such experiments. He became interested in studying marijuana's effects on AIDS wasting, the sometimes life-threatening weight reduction that results from a loss of appetite in people with AIDS, because many of his patients were already smoking marijuana. In 1992, Dr. Abrams designed a study with assistance from the Food and Drug Administration to compare smoked marijuana to Marinol in 40 patients with AIDS wasting. He planned to get marijuana from a Dutch growing company. His proposal won approval from the university's institutional-review board, as well as from the Research Advisory Panel of California, which must approve clinical trials of controlled substances. Next, Dr. Abrams and his colleagues applied to the Drug Enforcement Agency for a license to prescribe the illegal drug. Under the Controlled Substances Act, marijuana, like heroin and LSD, is a Schedule I drug, which means that it has a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use. Schedule II drugs, which have a high potential for abuse but also have a medical use and are easier to prescribe, include cocaine and methamphetamine. The application was rejected. "The message I got was they didn't want me importing marijuana across international borders," Dr. Abrams says. In August of 1994, he sent his F.D.A.-approved protocol to the National Institute on Drug Abuse requesting use of the institute's supply of cannabis. Nine months later, he received a letter from the institute's director, Alan I. Leshner, denying his request. "I think he said he regretted he couldn't [supply marijuana], but the study was not scientific." "I wrote him back and said, well gee, it's been approved by a number of august bodies, and for you to tell me that it's not scientific was a little bizarre," he says. "We finally heard that Alan Leshner said that if our study received favorable peer review, he would reconsider providing us with marijuana. I've been around long enough to understand that favorable peer review means submit it to the [National Institutes of Health] for a grant." Taking into account some of Mr. Leshner's criticisms, such as his requirement that the trial be performed in the hospital rather than on an outpatient basis, Dr. Abrams redesigned the study and applied for N.I.H. support in 1996. He planned to study 15 patients, in the hospital, for two 15-day periods of smoking either marijuana or the plant minus its active ingredients. Those periods would be separated by a three-week "washout,'' when the patients smoked nothing. The institute turned him down. "The media was saying to me by this time, 'Donald, surely this is political.' And I was saying, 'No, no, this is scientific, this is a review by my peers.'" But when he received the reviewers' comments, he decided he had been naive. Two of the reviewers were concerned about marijuana's toxicity -- which, many researchers point out, is far lower than that of most prescription medications. The third was concerned about the patients' risks of high cholesterol due to their increased appetites. "This is really not something that people with AIDS wasting have the luxury of worrying about," Dr. Abrams says. His team applied again, changing the focus of the study to examining the negative effects of marijuana. They would look at whether it interferes with the body's processing of widely used AIDS drugs called protease inhibitors, since cannabinoids are metabolized by the same system in the liver. They planned to study 63 people: One third would smoke marijuana, one third would take the Marinol pill, and one third would take a placebo pill. Asking to study the downside of medical marijuana seemed to do the trick. In 1997, five years after Dr. Abrams first applied to do research, the National Institutes of Health awarded him a grant and 1,400 marijuana cigarettes. He applied for and received a license from the Drug Enforcement Agency, and enrolled the first patient on May 12, 1998. Just a few weeks ago, the last patient returned home. But Dr. Abrams has not analyzed the data. "I didn't want any perception of having any bias or doing anything un-kosher" during the trial, he explains. He hopes to analyze the data in time to present them at the International AIDS Conference in Durban, South Africa, this summer. Although his trial was designed to look for negative effects, if he finds a trend toward weight gain, he plans to submit proposals to run trials looking specifically at that benefit. Despite several rejected applications, Dr. Russo, of Western Montana Clinic, says he will not change his proposed migraine study to look at safety, as Dr. Abrams did. "This is a compromise I personally will not make." Even with new regulations allowing researchers to apply for federal supplies of marijuana without financing from the National Institutes of Health, he is pessimistic about his chances of gaining access. His proposed trial, he says, "presents a pitfall for the government." If the trial is successful, "it immediately blows out of the water the governmental argument that there is no therapeutic value to cannabis." But Mr. Gust, of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, insists that the government's procedures are based on science alone. The N.I.H. finances only about one in four applications in any field, he says. And procedures for researchers with other sources of funds are only meant to give scientists "some feedback on how to make their protocol a rigorous one." "I've been kind of surprised there haven't been more requests and applications," Mr. Gust says. "We are open for business and I've been anticipating some requests, but they haven't come in." Researchers may be reluctant to go through tribulations like Dr. Abrams's, especially if they question whether even successful trials will affect marijuana's legal status. 'It'll never get approved" as a medicine, says Juan Sanchez-Ramos, a professor of neurology, pharmacology, and psychiatry at the University of South Florida. Dr. Sanchez-Ramos and other scientists may have recourse to a new drug being produced by GW Pharmaceuticals Ltd. The British company has developed an extract of marijuana -- the whole plant, not just THC -- that is sprayed under a patient's tongue. That allows it to reach the bloodstream quickly, without being metabolized in the liver, as pills are. The company began studies in April to test their cannabis extract on patients with multiple-sclerosis pain and spasticity. Dr. Sanchez-Ramos says he hopes to study the extract in Parkinson's-disease patients, and Dr. Russo's next step might be using it in his migraine studies. Dr. Abrams is also eager to study the extract. But he cautions that, as a pharmaceutical product, its cost may discourage many potential users. "There are always going to be people who are going to perhaps grow their own and use their own medicine," he says. For that reason, "it's still worthwhile looking at the medical effects of smoked marijuana." Section: Research & Publishing, Page: A21 Copyright © 2000 by The Chronicle of Higher EducationIssue Dated June 2, 2000Section: Research & Publishing, Page: A22Copyright © 2000 by The Chronicle of Higher Education Related Article & Web Site:Marijuana Policy Projecthttp://www.mpp.org/Studying AIDS Patients Who Use Their Own Marijuana http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread5888.shtmlCannabisNews Medical Marijuana Archives:http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/medical.shtml
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #15 posted by Ms Dug Weed on December 08, 2001 at 17:48:58 PT:
Alice and the Hooka Smoking Caterpiller
I see you found the Pic of Alice and the Caterpiller you wanted. I too am looking for the same graphic, except I'm looking the "Disney" one. If you could help me out it would be great.Thanks,
Ms. Dug Weed
ms_dug charter.net
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #14 posted by CongressmanSuet on June 01, 2000 at 20:30:02 PT:
Well, lets get real...
Why do you think all that smoke was coming out of his ears?
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #13 posted by dddd on June 01, 2000 at 03:25:59 PT
White Rabbit
Thanx FoM for posting those lyrics.Such nostalgia warm this old hippies heart.Thanx to Kap for reminding me of the Addams family hookah.I remember it well,and I always thought that "Mama'",was the one to see for what they put in the bowl,some kind of special Moonbud from the garden.You never know,they may have been smoking some cuttings from Cleopatra,which resembled a large carnivourous bud plant thing. I bet Uncle Fester had some interesting stash.........dddd
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #12 posted by freedom fighter on June 01, 2000 at 00:06:50 PT
a legend
you ppl!
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #11 posted by CongressmanSuet on May 31, 2000 at 20:40:08 PT:
You are right...
I forgot all about Gomez and Morticia[ especiallly Morticia] puffing away on that BIG hookah...ah, the laments of a misguided and forgotten youth...
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #10 posted by FoM on May 31, 2000 at 19:40:28 PT
Nice To Take A Trip Back In Time
Hi Everyone! It took me awhile but I finally found the picture I was looking for of Alice, the Catepillar and the Hookah! AEIOUPlus the words to White Rabbit!Enjoy!White Rabbit©1967 G. SlickOne pill makes you largerand one pill makes you smalland the ones that mother gives youdon't do anything at all:Go ask Alicewhen she's ten feet tall.And if you go chasing rabbitsand you know you'regoing to falltell 'em all a hookahsmoking catepillarhas given you the call:Call Alicewhen she was just small.When men on the chessboardget up and tell you where to goand you've just hadsome kind of mushroomand your mind is moving low:Go ask AliceI think she'll know.When logic and proportionhave fallen sloppy deadand the white knight is talking backawardsand the Red Queen's:'off with her head'-Remember what the doormouse said:Feed your head!Feed you head!http://www.cannabinoid.com/wwwboard/politics/binaries/26/26125.gif
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #9 posted by kaptinemo on May 31, 2000 at 17:44:28 PT:
Oh, that was a goodie!
Thanks, guy, I needed a good laugh! And, no, unfortunately, I was never in India. Spent lots of time in Western Europe (Ik hou van Holland en Ik ben gek voor Amsterdam!) though. And some day, I'll go back...And, yes, my favorite 'chalice' did look an awful lot like the illustrations in that old classic of 'Mr. Carroll'. It was one of my favorites as a child. But the Disney animation remains my favorite pre-PC (We can't show that! That Caterpiller has to be stoned, what else do you use a hookah for!) cartoon. Which is rarely shown, uncut anymore. Like anything even remotely hinting at cannabis use (Remember the old Addams Family TV series, and the episodes where the two main characters would occasionally smoke a waterpipe? You never see those either) those days of comparative sanity have been replaced by Barry-approved dreck.I'm getting morose. God, how I hate neo-Puritans!!!!!
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #8 posted by SuspectStereotype on May 31, 2000 at 16:43:39 PT
Sharing the experience
There is really nothing like sharing a bit of good reefer with a group of thoughtful and/or humorous people. In a way, this newsgroup is a little like a virtual hooka.Thanks for the buzz, FoM.BTW I dont think you can get quite the same effect from sharing a supository. After the first person used it, it would be a little funky.:)
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #7 posted by dddd on May 31, 2000 at 02:43:06 PT
aroma
Yes,it's true...There is nothing quite as wonderful as the heavenly waft of from freshly ignited indica bud,or premium sativa.Just the aroma itself brings an inner calm. This spray idea is another obvios attempt to allow marijuana as an expensive pharmaceutical,while maintaining full prisons,and huge amounts of money for the drug war industry. I'm afraid this spray wont do it for me.Smoking reefer is a religious sacrament for me. A while back,they were working on a marijuana suppository.I dont like the idea of putting anything in my butt.Butts are for output,not input.I dont want to spray it under my tongue either.I dont want to have to go and pay some doctor to write a perscription for me to get burned by some crooked drug company monopoly.....All I want to do,is have the very basic freedom,and right,to grow a plant that God put here,and do whatever I want with it.Even then,I dont think I'd put it in my butt.but if I wanted to,it should be no one elses business.Especially not our evil uncle.........Sam .......dddd
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #6 posted by J Christen-Mitchell on May 30, 2000 at 21:20:48 PT:
Arthritic Releaf
A buddy recently moved here from California. He told me the story today of how a Mexican coworker asked him for 'Mota", a green bud. He took it home, placed it in a small glass of alcohol and a few days later could dab the liquid on his knee for relief of arthritic swelling. A Mexican folk cure. Effective and no side effects. Americans, especially the elderly have been swindled out of a better life by the evil of prohibition.
Jeff for Congress
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #5 posted by FoM on May 30, 2000 at 21:04:22 PT
Thanks Guys!
All I can say to the 2 of you is:A E I O Uaah!
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #4 posted by CongressmanSuet on May 30, 2000 at 19:17:08 PT:
Ah, but there is an advantage..
to using some kind of artificial THC delivery device. What we get now is somewhat unpredictable. Because its illegal there is no quality control. With the new delivery devices, you could decide if you just wanted a quiet, mellow degree of intoxication, or you wanted to see aliens land in your meadow. By coming up with ways to ingest pure THC, the Gov. plan could seriously backfire. And Kap, all of a sudden I had this mental picture of the Hookah in "Alice in Wonderland". I bet you have been to India. Hehe.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #3 posted by kaptinemo on May 30, 2000 at 18:24:40 PT:
Your Eau de Pot already exists, FoM
If you look at the back of the 1996 edition of 'The Emperor Wears No Clothes" you will see an advertisement for - you guessed it - a cannabis perfume.With regards to the ritualistic aspect of smoking: I admit to being one who has engaged in precisely that. I didn't smoke anything before cannabis, as I hated the smell of tobacco. Still do. But with cannabis there was that...*herbal* ...scent which I found so very agreeable. Maybe it's just those latent anandamide receptors in the brain getting a wake-up call. Maybe it's just a learned response, associating the scent with pleasure, so the scent *becomes* pleasurable. Whatever. But it was and still is (as Picasso had said about opium,) "One of the least stupid smells in nature."To sit within a group of friends, each taking turns drawing on their own hose from an old fashioned Turkish hookah, sharing stories and information, and genuinely enjoying each other's company... it didn't get any better than that. No sour smell of spilled drinks, no rowdy behavior, no harsh words, no feelings hurt, no punches thrown, no black eyes. No knife fights... or worse. No slovenly behavior or later regrets for acting like a disgustingly drunken ass.And this, *this* remains illegal? All I can say is that, I honestly feel that the antis are patently insane to try to keep people from using this herb. Out and out nuts.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by FoM on May 30, 2000 at 17:20:32 PT
Healing aromas
That was cruel! LOL! That is a problem. Aromas are so important. I believe and use aromatherapy. I use different essential oils to achieve different things. I sure wouldn't want to give up aromas. I wonder if they will put the aromas in the device? Now that would be ok! Not a 100 percent solution but a little solution.PS: Wouldn't it be hard to keep on the shelf if they were able to extract different pot aromas and sell them! Oh my how nice. When we'd go out I'd put on perfume de la pot! LOL!
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by CongressmanSuet on May 30, 2000 at 16:25:29 PT:
Well, what do you think folks...
they developed a spray that gives a dose similar to smoked Cannabis. You can have the beneficial effects of the plant, without the negatives[ that sometimes nasty smoke]. Like a THC Inhaler, you would just puff a few times, and you would be able to control dosage[not get too stoned]. You would always have the advantage of having the strongest THC available, no more swag! But, just how much is the ritual of smoking Cannabis entwined with its mystique? Would you want to give up that exquisite taste that comes from the better strains? The aroma of Pakistani Hash just after you crumble it,passing from person to person,which creates a sense of community and empathy among participants,being members of a sensible minority who are obviously[ its one of the reasons we arent getting results faster in this fight against Cannabis] much more peaceful, I dont know, the inhaler is starting to sound kinda dull to me...
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment


Name: Optional Password: 
E-Mail: 
Subject: 
Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]
Link URL: 
Link Title: