cannabisnews.com: Sheriff Not in Contempt





Sheriff Not in Contempt
Posted by FoM on March 31, 2000 at 10:18:55 PT
By Maline Hazle, Record Searchlight
Source: Record Searchlight
A Trinity County Superior Court judge has thrown out contempt of court allegations against Shasta County Sheriff Jim Pope for surrendering a Redding man's medicinal marijuana to a federal drug agent.
Pope and Undersheriff Larry Schaller ''could not have willfully failed to obey a specific provision'' of Shasta County Superior Court Judge Bradley Boeckman's order to return the marijuana because the document did not say precisely when or where the return should occur, Judge John Letton said in his written order. ''Contempt of court 'can only rest upon clear, intentional violation of a specific, narrowly drawn order. Specificity is an essential prerequisite,''' Letton, citing a 1987 state appellate court ruling, wrote in the order made public Thursday.Letton was assigned the politically sensitive case after all nine Shasta County judges removed themselves.''That's wonderful,'' Deputy Shasta County Counsel John Loomis said when he learned of the ruling Thursday. ''I always felt that our legal and factual position was strong, but you never know what a judge is going to do.''Sheriff Pope said Thursday evening he was pleased with the ruling.''I always thought what I did and what we did was legal, ethical and ... the right thing to do,'' he said.On Thursday afternoon, Schaller submitted to the Record Searchlight a letter to the editor that provided new details of how the seizure came about. It described the undersheriff's desire to return the marijuana to Richard Levin in the presence of Drug Enforcement Administration agents.''My specific request was that the DEA seize the contraband from the defendant (Richard Levin) immediately after we complied with the local court order,'' Schaller wrote. ''It was the DEA's decision and prerogative to make the seizure, pursuant to a federal warrant, from the Sheriff's Evidence (lab) and not from the defendant.''Levin, 49, was acquitted of cultivation of marijuana for sale in December after a jury found he grew it legally under the state's Compassionate Use Act, Proposition 215.The law does not specify how many plants or how much marijuana a patient is allowed, only that patients need a doctor's recommendation. Pope and others in the law enforcement community say more specific guidelines are needed.Levin's attorney, Eric Berg of Redding, said Schaller's letter suggests that having lost the case in Superior Court, the sheriff wanted to retaliate by having Levin arrested on federal charges.''I presume they would be seizing it because it was illegal to have it; that would mean they would be arresting Mr. Levin for having it,'' Berg said. ''But then why not arrest the sheriff for having it? Because he had it legally, just as Mr. Levin would have under the state's Compassionate Use Act.''Berg said Schaller's letter shows ''what we have been contending all along'' and is more evidence that the sheriff's office intended to ''undermine the court's ruling and undermine the Compassionate Use Act.''Berg said he and his client are debating whether to appeal Letton's ruling or ask that the case be heard again.The ruling angered Levin.''There's obviously a huge conspiracy up here (in Shasta County) to break the law,'' Levin said. ''Why don't they go through legal channels and get it on the ballot if they want to change this law? I don't want to live in this Nazi town anymore.''After Levin's acquittal in December, Berg asked Boeckman, the trial judge, to order Pope to return marijuana, guns and other items seized when sheriff's deputies raided his home in 1998.Boeckman ordered the release of Levin's 1 pounds of marijuana and 41 dead plants, and sheriff's deputies returned to court to ask if they could destroy it. Boeckman clarified his order and said the marijuana should go to Levin but did not set a time for the return.Berg and Levin did not ask the judge to set a specific time, Letton noted in his order.Berg then arranged to pick up the marijuana at 1:30 p.m. Jan. 21, but that morning a sheriff's representative called Berg to change the time to 4 p.m., according to court documents.Meanwhile, in Sacramento, U.S. Magistrate Dale A. Drozd issued a federal seizure warrant at 11:23 a.m., court documents show.A copy of the warrant was faxed to the sheriff's office at 12:04 p.m., and when Berg and Levin showed up to retrieve the marijuana at 4 p.m. they were told a federal agent had just left with it, the court documents say.Berg argued that the sheriff engineered the federal intervention because he does not believe in Proposition 215 and then changed the pickup time to give the federal agent time to drive to Redding from Sacramento.Letton's ruling said that was not relevant in this case.''The suggestion that the respondents solicited the federal warrant, even if proven at a hearing, would not change the inevitable conclusion.''Citing another appellate court ruling to back his decision, Letton said the federal magistrate, not Pope and Schaller, ''chose to issue the seizure warrant (for Levin's pot) after considering the affidavit of the DEA agent.''Reporter Maline Hazle can be reached at 225-8266 or at mhazle redding.comPublished: Friday, March 31, 2000© 2000 Record Searchlight - The E.W. Scripps Co. Related Articles:Sheriff May Face Contempt Hearinghttp://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread5114.shtmlTrinity County Judge Appointed To Sheriff's Casehttp://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread4964.shtmlLevins Sue Over Pot Arresthttp://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread4758.shtmlRedding Police Won't Return Med. Marijuana to Vethttp://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread4663.shtmlCannabisNews Articles from The Record Searchlight:http://www.google.com/search?num=10&q=cannabisnews+record+searchlight+site:www.cannabisnews.com
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #3 posted by kaptinemo on April 02, 2000 at 13:09:18 PT:
How contemptuous does it have to get before it is 
obvious?' 'On Thursday afternoon, Schaller submitted to the Record Searchlight a letter to the editor that provided new details of how the seizure came about. It described the undersheriff's desire to return the marijuana to Richard Levin in the presence of Drug Enforcement Administration agents.''My specific request was that the DEA seize the contraband from the defendant (Richard Levin) immediately after we complied with the local court order,'' Schaller wrote. ''It was the DEA's decision and prerogative to make the seizure, pursuant to a federal warrant, from the Sheriff's Evidence (lab) and not from the defendant.''Let's see: the Sheriff is not a Federal Agent. He is not even a State policeman. He is a local LEO. So why did he call the Feds? Because he wanted to publicly humiliate Levin by having Feds present so that when he complied with the lawful order to return the weed, the Feds could arrest Levin on the spot. He could have simply returned Levin's medicine, and discharged his duty as a local LEO.Contacting the Feds was unnecessary and not in his purview to do as a local LEO. But instead, he conspired to bring in the Feds, thinking that their 'legal umbrella' would protect him from any future attempts at recompense by Levin. Besides, he wanted to 'make an example' of him to all other cannabis users. He wanted to be there to smile in Levin's face and gloat at how smart he was in arranging this 'meeting' which would have resulted in Levin's arraignment on *Federal* charges. But the sheriff wasn't quite smart enough, and had to settle for the Feds sneaking away with it.Pope and Undersheriff Larry Schaller ''could not have willfully failed to obey a specific provision'' of Shasta County Superior Court Judge Bradley Boeckman's order to return the marijuana because the document did not say precisely when or where the return should occur, Judge John Letton said in his written order. ''Contempt of court 'can only rest upon clear, intentional violation of a specific, narrowly drawn order. Specificity is an essential prerequisite,''' Letton, citing a 1987 state appellate court ruling, wrote in the order made public Thursday.'Now this is really stretching things: no specific time or location for the transfer? Letton fears getting his johnson caught in the veritable political meatgrinder; hence the weasel words.There is contempt here, all right. Contempt by the people who have been hired by us ..for us. Time to remind these public servants that 5 of us pays for one of them. November is coming, people.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by Dankhank on April 01, 2000 at 21:36:10 PT:
Not All the Time
It seems hopeless, at times ...and yes, we get sad ...But if we keep talking, mailing, rallying, posting...And at times get mad ...We can change the world-we've done it before...Let's get to the task ...Peace and Love to all ...
Hemp n Stuff
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by greenfox on March 31, 2000 at 11:15:03 PT
Aquitted
"A Trinity County Superior Court judge has thrown out contempt of court allegations against Shasta County Sheriff Jim Pope for surrendering a Redding man's medicinal marijuana to a federal drug agent."They always break the law and get away with it... they always win. It makes me sad...
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment


Name: Optional Password: 
E-Mail: 
Subject: 
Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]
Link URL: 
Link Title: