Two House Bills Would End Federal Prohibition

function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('Two House Bills Would End Federal Prohibition');
 site = new Array(5);
 return false;

  Two House Bills Would End Federal Prohibition

Posted by CN Staff on February 20, 2015 at 19:30:58 PT
By Matt Ferner 
Source: Huffington Post 

Washington, D.C. -- Two congressmen filed separate House bills on Friday that together would legalize, regulate and tax marijuana at the federal level, effectively ending the U.S. government's decadeslong prohibition of the plant.Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.) introduced the Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol Act, which would remove marijuana from the Controlled Substances Act's schedules, transfer oversight of the substance from the Drug Enforcement Administration over to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and regulate marijuana in a way similar to how alcohol is currently regulated in the U.S.
Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) introduced the Marijuana Tax Revenue Act, which would set up a federal excise tax for regulated marijuana.The bills would not force states to legalize marijuana, but a federal regulatory framework would be in place for those states that do decide to legalize it. To date, four states and the District of Columbia have legalized recreational marijuana (however, D.C.'s model continues to ban sales), 23 states have legalized marijuana for medical purposes and 11 other states have legalized the limited use of low-THC forms of marijuana for medical use."While President Obama and the Justice Department have allowed the will of voters in states like Colorado and 22 other jurisdictions to move forward, small business owners, medical marijuana patients, and others who follow state laws still live with the fear that a new administration -- or this one -- could reverse course and turn them into criminals," Polis said in a statement Friday. "It is time for us to replace the failed prohibition with a regulatory system that works and let states and municipalities decide for themselves if they want, or don't want, to have legal marijuana within their borders."Despite the programs currently in place in Colorado and Washington state -- as well as those that will soon go into effect in Oregon, Alaska and D.C. -- the sale, possession, production and distribution of marijuana all remain illegal under federal law. The states that have legalized marijuana or softened penalties for possession have only been able to do so because of federal guidance urging prosecutors to refrain from targeting state-legal marijuana operations.With marijuana legalization supported by a majority of Americans, and a new wave of states considering loosening their marijuana laws over the next several years, it seems unlikely that the federal government would push back against the popular movement. But it's not completely out of the realm of possibility.Harvard economist Jeff Miron, a vocal supporter of marijuana policy reform, highlighted the precarious nature of state marijuana laws in a recent op-ed for CNN on why Congress needs to act now on federal marijuana policy."Despite the compelling case for legalization, and progress toward legalization at the state level, ultimate success is not assured," Miron wrote. "Federal law still prohibits marijuana, and existing jurisprudence (Gonzales v. Raich 2005) holds that federal law trumps state law when it comes to marijuana prohibition. So far, the federal government has mostly taken a hands-off approach to state medicalizations and legalizations, but in January 2017, the country will have a new president. That person could order the attorney general to enforce federal prohibition regardless of state law."On Friday, Blumenauer called the federal prohibition of marijuana "a failure" that has wasted tax dollars and ruined lives. He also said it's time for the government to forge a new path ahead for the plant."As more states move to legalize marijuana as Oregon, Colorado, Washington and Alaska have done," Blumenauer said, "it's imperative the federal government become a full partner in building a workable and safe framework."Source: Huffington Post (NY)Author: Matt Ferner, The Huffington Post	Published: February 20, 2015Copyright: 2015, LLC Contact: scoop huffingtonpost.comWebsite:  -- Cannabis Archives 

Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help    

Comment #9 posted by Oleg the Tumor on February 23, 2015 at 13:22:47 PT
Looking Ahead to 2016
The next election cycle (unlike the last) will not be free of questions regarding cannabis.Both (or all) candidates will have to take a position on cannabis one way or the other, long before the election.Since cannabis is the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about, it really does make a lot more sense to settle this issue before the next election, rather than then trying to ignore it. (Again)If only Uncle Sam would allow this to become the states rights issue that it really is, then neither candidate will actually need to talk about it. In 2016, whoever comes out against legalization in the presidential campaign, loses. It's a game of "Suicide Kings".  In the meantime, Washington, DC, is being portrayed as a place where the ballot box really does not matter, and as the seat of democracy, is therefore the laughing stock of the world!The fact is, in the 1930s, some very smart and very crooked people decided that petroleum would replace renewable agricultural resources as a raw material for manufacturing purposes, and using money as speech, they bought the prohibition of cannabis, fair and square. They would like to keep it that way and will actually file lawsuits to keep the truth from being told.As far as this quote goes,
"… but in January 2017, the country will have a new president. That person could order the attorney general to enforce federal prohibition regardless of state law."This presumes that the new president campaigned with "continued prohibition" as a campaign promise. The Titanic had a better chance.FREE THE PRISONER OF SCHEDULE 1!Now We the People, are taking it back. It is not rattlesnake venom, but a friend.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #8 posted by FoM on February 22, 2015 at 15:47:58 PT
John Tyler
Thank you!
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #7 posted by The GCW on February 22, 2015 at 15:30:13 PT
John Tyler,
Thanks, that was good.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #6 posted by John Tyler on February 22, 2015 at 08:28:12 PT
Bill Maher Calls For Marijuana Legalization
In case it missed it, Bill Maher Calls For Marijuana Legalization On 'Real Time’.
Here is the link addition to a pardon for nonviolent offenders, they should get some sizeable amount of compensation (to be determined) for the trouble they have had to endure.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #5 posted by runruff on February 21, 2015 at 15:27:07 PT

I don't know about their timing but I believe they are for real!
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #4 posted by keninsj on February 21, 2015 at 14:09:30 PT:

I find it ironic that the 2 democrats choose to do this now and not 6 months ago when it had some hope of passing. Makes me wonder if they are just trying to appease their constituents, but knowing full well that this would not pass. It is good that they are getting exposure, but if they were really serious, it would have been introduced when democrats had control.Just my 2 cents, and worth just as much.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #3 posted by potpal on February 21, 2015 at 13:28:11 PT

To quote Jackie Gleason...
And away we go! 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by runruff on February 21, 2015 at 08:15:19 PT

But, but...
Congress is dominated by repulicons?
[ Post Comment ]

  Post Comment