cannabisnews.com: L.A. Sued Over New Medical Marijuana Law
function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('L.A. Sued Over New Medical Marijuana Law');
 url=encodeURIComponent('http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/25/thread25460.shtml');
 site = new Array(5);
 site[0]='http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[1]='http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit.php?url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[2]='http://digg.com/submit?topic=political_opinion&media=video&url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[3]='http://reddit.com/submit?url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[4]='http://del.icio.us/post?v=4&noui&jump=close&url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 window.open(site[num],'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=620,height=500');
 return false;
}






L.A. Sued Over New Medical Marijuana Law
Posted by CN Staff on March 02, 2010 at 14:31:02 PT
By The Associated Press
Source: New York Times
Los Angeles -- A lawsuit filed Tuesday challenges Los Angeles' crackdown on medical marijuana dispensaries, claiming it would force nearly all of them to close.The suit by the nation's largest medical marijuana advocacy group accuses the city of violating the state constitutional rights of pot clinic operators and claims the city ordinance ''deprives the seriously ill of the medicine promised them by the electorate and the Legislature of California.''
It wants a judge to permanently prevent the new law from being enforced and to award damages.City attorney's spokesman Frank Mateljan had no immediate comment.California voters passed a law in 1996 that legalized marijuana use for medical reasons, but it didn't say anything about distribution. So some cities have permitted dispensaries to flourish while others, such as Costa Mesa and Fresno, have effectively banned them and arrested owners.Los Angeles has been struggling for years with the issue of controlling dispensaries. The ordinance that the mayor signed last month caps the number of dispensaries in the city at 70.City officials have estimated there could be as many as 1,000 outlets in the city and that some sell pot as a business. Last month, the city filed lawsuits and eviction notices against 21 dispensaries and arrested one owner.The lawsuit filed Tuesday in Los Angeles County Superior Court claims the pot ordinance is unreasonable. It says dispensaries have only seven days after the measure takes effect March 14 to find a new location if they are within 1,0000 feet of schools, churches, parks or other ''sensitive areas.'' The ordinance also bars dispensaries from locating near homes and apartment buildings.The city, however, failed to create maps of approved locations before the ordinance was passed despite two years of work on the regulations, the suit said.The measure violates due process and will force ''the vast majority'' of medical marijuana collectives to close, the suit contends.The suit was filed by two dispensaries, Venice Beach Care Center and PureLife Alternative Wellness Center, and their operators, who claim they have been unable to find new locations. It also was filed by Oakland-based Americans for Free Access, a nonprofit that has more than 30,000 members in more than 40 states.The Obama administration announced last year that people complying with state marijuana laws would not face federal arrest. But they are subject to local laws.A version of this article appeared in print on March 2, 2010, on 4 of the New York edition.Source: New York Times (NY)Published: March 2, 2010Copyright: 2010 The New York Times CompanyContact: letters nytimes.comWebsite: http://www.nytimes.com/URL: http://drugsense.org/url/TCqoHIf2CannabisNews Medical Marijuana Archiveshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/list/medical.shtml
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help 
     
     
     
     




Comment #6 posted by Hope on March 02, 2010 at 20:23:32 PT
Free is a step up from just safe...
but remember when safe access was just a dream and a hope and a wonderful goal? Now some places at least do have safe access, so I guess working towards free access after a certain amount of safe access has been realized is the way to go now. I just hadn't noticed that change, either, until now.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #5 posted by FoM on March 02, 2010 at 20:10:35 PT
Hope
I didn't notice that but free access sounds better then just safe access. 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #4 posted by Hope on March 02, 2010 at 19:55:29 PT
Americans for Free Access?
When did they change it or did they? I thought it has always been Americans for Safe Access.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #3 posted by Hope on March 02, 2010 at 19:52:32 PT
Well... we're still being beaten around 
the head and shoulders... but by golly... we have got a bit of a voice these days and some ways to fight back without killing anyone.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by gloovins on March 02, 2010 at 17:04:44 PT
Aww Cmon,...
Let's just pass this & be done with it!http://www.taxcannabis.org/index.php/pages/initiative/Don't worry drinkers of booze and tobacco smokers -- your killer stuff will still be legal!We the People want a safer alternative though....
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by HempWorld on March 02, 2010 at 15:23:48 PT
Go ASA!
Sue the lot of them!
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment