cannabisnews.com: Marijuana Use a Safer Choice Than Alcohol 





Marijuana Use a Safer Choice Than Alcohol 
Posted by CN Staff on October 20, 2006 at 07:53:37 PT
By Mason Tvert
Source: Pueblo Chieftain
Colorado -- Amendment 44, the Alcohol-Marijuana Equalization Initiative, was proposed for one simple reason: The laws currently on the books force adults to choose alcohol instead of marijuana when they seek to relax or socialize. Given alcohol is far more harmful than marijuana, this makes no sense whatsoever.Let’s consider just a few of the facts.
Alcohol is deadly; marijuana is not. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, approximately 20,000 Americans die annually as the direct result of alcohol consumption. The comparable number for marijuana is zero.In addition, as the Colorado on-campus deaths of students like Samantha Spady and Gordy Bailey make clear, alcohol overdose deaths are not just possible, but an all-too-frequent occurrence. Marijuana, on the other hand, has never caused an overdose death.Alcohol increases the likelihood of violent behavior; marijuana does not. For example, the U.S. Department of Justice has reported the following about crime in the United States: “Two-thirds of victims who suffered violence by an intimate (a current or former spouse, boyfriend, or girlfriend) reported that alcohol had been a factor. Among spouse victims, three out of four incidents were reported to have involved an offender who had been drinking.”Alcohol is especially problematic on college campuses. Drinking by college students, ages 18 to 24, contributes to an estimated 1,400 student deaths, 500,000 injuries and 70,000 cases of sexual assaults or date rapes each year, according to a 2002 study commissioned by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Task Force on College Drinking.While these numbers are staggering, some statistics are even more powerful when conveyed as percentages. For example, researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health College found that nearly three quarters (72 percent) of all college female rape victims experienced rape while intoxicated.In order to correct this illogical system, and to give adults the freedom to use marijuana if that is what they prefer, we have proposed making the possession of up to one ounce of marijuana legal for individuals 21 years of age and older. If you look at the language of our proposed measure, you will see this is our only intent. In fact, we specifically make it clear that possession of marijuana by individuals under the age of 21 will remain illegal.Yet the attorney general of this state, John Suthers, in The Chieftain, has accused us of “recklessly” legalizing transfers of marijuana to minors. He has even libelously said that we are advocating such a change in law.He knowingly ignored the fact that the drafters of the Blue Book (state voter guide) in the state legislature were the ones who claimed our initiative would legalize transfers to minors, with language the Rocky Mountain News called “misleading” and “false.” In response, we sued the Legislative Council in court in order to clarify that such transfers would remain illegal after passage of our initiative due to the existence of a “contributing the delinquency of a minor” statute.This statute provides, in very clear language, that it is a felony to aid a minor in breaking a state law. Since possession of marijuana by a minor will still be illegal after passage of our initiative, providing a minor with any amount of marijuana will be a felony.The attorney general said in his column - and the Chieftain editorial board strangely agreed - that a “creative defense attorney” would somehow convince a judge that people voting for our initiative intended to make transfers of marijuana to minors legal. This is absurd.The attorney general should be far more concerned about the fact that he is going around the state telling defense attorneys that the contributing to the delinquency of a minor statute does not apply to transfers of marijuana to minors. This means individuals committing such an act will only be charged under current possession laws and subject to a $100 fine, which your paper recognizes as “not a high priority for law enforcement.” If he doesn’t think marijuana should be transferred to minors, why on earth is he telling everyone it is (and should remain) only a $100 fine right now and not a felony? Nice work, Mr. Suthers.Please don’t let elected officials fool or scare you into keeping marijuana illegal. Those who want to maintain our alcohol-based society - and the violence and death frequently associated with it - are the ones who are truly “reckless.”Vote YES on Amendment 44 and help make Colorado safer.On The Net:Marijuana Legalization: http://www.SAFERcolorado.org Note: Mason Tvert of Denver is the campaign director for SAFER, the political action group promoting Amendment 44 marijuana legalization.Complete Title: Marijuana Use a Safer Choice Than Alcohol ConsumptionSource: Pueblo Chieftain (CO)Author: Mason TvertPublished: October 15, 2006 Copyright: 2006 The Star-Journal Publishing Corp.Website: http://www.chieftain.com/Contact: newsroom chieftain.comRelated Articles & Web Sites:Safer Choicehttp://www.saferchoice.org/ Marijuana Vote in The Bag?http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22307.shtmlExpert Says Law Would Increase Marijuana Usehttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22228.shtmlAdults Should Be Allowed To Choosehttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22225.shtml
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #48 posted by Toker00 on October 22, 2006 at 03:25:53 PT
Whig
I noticed that the first comment on that post was by a Republican wanting to talk to you in "secret". Hmmm...but I liked your response to him. Very good.Toke.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #47 posted by whig on October 21, 2006 at 18:27:57 PT
FoM
It's a Jewish family name. Small community, when you get down to it.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #46 posted by whig on October 21, 2006 at 18:27:23 PT
Toker00
http://cannablog.wordpress.com/2006/10/21/submitted-without-present-comment-3/
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #45 posted by FoM on October 21, 2006 at 17:59:12 PT
whig
I don't know how common the name Adler is but they could be related. 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #44 posted by whig on October 21, 2006 at 17:57:57 PT
FoM
My grandmother was an Adler. Wonder if he was related.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #43 posted by whig on October 21, 2006 at 17:55:05 PT
mayan
The mainstream media has owners with a financial stake.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #42 posted by mayan on October 21, 2006 at 15:28:42 PT
whig
Isn't that just crazy? A controlled demolition of a building that size would take weeks to plan and rig. Silverstein made a huge chunk of change from the insurance policy on those buildings also. Imho, building #7 is the absolute smoking gun which proves beyond any doubt that 9/11 was an inside job. Why does the mainstream media never talk about WTC #7???
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #41 posted by whig on October 21, 2006 at 14:55:56 PT
mayan
We decided to pull it:http://cannablog.wordpress.com/2006/10/21/we-decided-to-pull-it/
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #40 posted by FoM on October 21, 2006 at 12:39:46 PT
Toker00
I won't tolerate someone yelling at me or putting me down. I am an adult and think like I do and for me it is right. I will always believe in the flower in the gun as the answer. I believe you understand what I mean. 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #39 posted by Toker00 on October 21, 2006 at 12:34:55 PT
Whig
No problem bro. I use darker colors to paint my posts than you sometimes. I have been accused of being to quick to jump. You say things exactly as I think them sometimes, but then you surprise me with that sharp tongue. At my age, I'm not used to that! lol.Toke. 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #38 posted by whig on October 21, 2006 at 12:12:48 PT
Toker00
I really like that declaration by the way. I might link it from cannablog later, need to go shopping with my wife shortly.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #37 posted by whig on October 21, 2006 at 11:58:11 PT
Toker00
You and I speak differently, and sometimes maybe we don't understand one another. I hear coup d'etat and cringe, even though I know how peaceful you are. And you say a people's coup, which is really fine and if it's not violent then that's exactly what is happening right now, only I don't like that word for its implications.I hope I'm expressing myself in a way that isn't rude to you.What I've done on cannablog is declare convention. That seems like a more moderate word than coup. The present form I have chosen to call the convention is grand jury of investigation.I wonder if my own language is hard for some people to understand. This is how we make revolution without being radical -- this is how we make a revolution that liberals and conservatives will both understand and respect, in my opinion.This is constitutional language. This is moderate, necessary and based on millennia of history.It helps that I'm a former right-winger myself so I speak their own language to them. I hope it makes sense to you too.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #36 posted by Patrick on October 21, 2006 at 08:24:12 PT
a SAFER Colorado?
Mason was very good. I especially loved it when he asked the older lady “why do you want to maintain a status quo where younger people can obtain marijuana easier than older people? That's a failed policy!” I think the general voting population is starting to finally get that. I hope so. We'll know in a few weeks if Colorado gets it?
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #35 posted by mayan on October 21, 2006 at 07:57:02 PT
Great Video
The Destruction of Building 7:
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-4556787288866368337Please spread this one around!
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #34 posted by potpal on October 21, 2006 at 07:25:17 PT
SAFER
Mason is the man. He's got balls. I like balls. To go up against the DEA and the alcohol cartels is a very brave thing to do. I admire him for sticking to his message, an honest message. Give adults the choice, they have it now, however stop treating good citizens that choose to use cannabis like criminals. He could easily go after the reasoning the opponents of 44 keep hidden behind their outrageous, off the wall, accusations, 3 out 4 experience violence... How the LEOs wanna save their govt jobs and keep them easy, protect their dealers, some own stakes in pee test companies, or bigpharm, so many different motivations that result in the big lies they spout to cover their ass...ets, some just paid mouthpieces for bigpharm. Stay the course! End prohibition.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #33 posted by mayan on October 21, 2006 at 06:33:58 PT
John Adler, R.I.P. 
Marijuana advocate known for legalization antics:
http://starbulletin.com/2006/10/21/news/story12.htmlS.D. news...South Dakotans to decide medical marijuana measure Nov. 7:
http://tinyurl.com/yar49dLaw Enforcement Condemns Marijuana Measure:
http://www.keloland.com/News/NewsDetail6371.cfm?Id=0,51855 Global Warming, that is an excellent piece by Mason Tvert. I have never seen one person systematically neutralize an army of prohibitionists in the manner that Mason has. The fascists have absolutely no bullets left, only blanks! The liars and lies have all been exposed and any further attempts to demonize cannabis or posture and whine about the children will backfire. After the last two debates on 44, I would guess that next poll will probably look pretty good for us! Like Mason says, in the next two weeks we will surely hear more desperate hysterics from the prohibitionists, but logic and facts will prevail over hysteria and lies. The people are sick of lies and will see 44 to a landslide victory. I just hope Colorado's Diebold machines don't get hacked!WASH POST: DIEBOLD TOUCHSCREEN SOURCE CODE DISCOVERED STOLEN IN MARYLAND!
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=3644Former delegate gets purported Diebold code:
http://tinyurl.com/y9ua86Will The Next Election Be Hacked? by ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.:
http://tinyurl.com/s3cue
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #32 posted by Toker00 on October 21, 2006 at 06:25:02 PT
Sorry for so many OTs. Please forgive.
I attribute it to my intense passion for my GOD and PLANET.It's time for the fourth branch of the United States Government to perform a coup de 'etat.(sp) It is time to change our government.Please read as an American citizen:http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/2006/101906MARKOFF.htmlToke.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #31 posted by global_warming on October 21, 2006 at 01:03:37 PT
Go Mason
No logical reason to punish adults for using marijuana over alcoholBy Mason Tvert
October 21, 2006Boo!That's a preview of the strongest argument opponents of Amendment 44 - the Alcohol-Marijuana Equalization Initiative - will put forth in the last two weeks of the campaign.Don't expect an open and honest discussion about the merits of making marijuana possession legal for adults. Instead, expect every possible scare tactic related to children you can imagine. Before our opponents are done, you will think we are trying to make marijuana part of the free lunch program at elementary schools.And why are our opponents hiding behind children? Perhaps it is because there is no logical reason to punish adults for making the rational choice to use marijuana instead of alcohol. Here are just a few reasons why: snipped from http://tinyurl.com/yanjml
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #30 posted by The GCW on October 20, 2006 at 21:05:32 PT
Jonathan Adler 
I'm expecting Jonathan Adler to continue helping the cause.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #29 posted by The GCW on October 20, 2006 at 21:03:17 PT
Again; Colorado was 1st to repeal the original.
Colorado was the 1st state to repeal alcohol prohibition as Laura Kriho points out in THE LETTER OF THE WEEK.Web: Letter of the Weekhttp://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n1413/a07.html?397YES ON 44 By Laura Kriho Colorado was the first state to vote to repeal alcohol prohibition in 1932, and we have the chance to be the first state to vote to repeal cannabis ( marijuana ) prohibition with the passage of Amendment 44. In 1932, forward-thinking Colorado citizens put an initiative on the ballot to repeal alcohol prohibition. It passed with 56 percent of the vote. However, in 1937, Congress enacted cannabis prohibition via the Marijuana Tax Act. Cannabis prohibition created a new black market in cannabis, which has led to the same violence and corruption seen in the alcohol prohibition era. It also gave rise to government agencies like the Drug Enforcement Administration, which not only uses your tax dollars to arrest and imprison nonviolent cannabis users, but also actively campaigns for cannabis prohibition in our democratic elections. In more than 10,000 years of almost constant human use, cannabis has never caused a single overdose. It is safer than aspirin and has many more medicinal uses. In 1988, the DEA's chief administrative law judge called it the "safest therapeutically active substances known to man." Cannabis, like alcohol, should be legal for adults to use in the privacy of their own home for recreation as well as medicine. It is prohibition that causes harm to society, not the substance. Alcohol prohibition only lasted from 1920 to 1933, a mere 13 years. Cannabis prohibition has lasted an amazing 69 years. Why has it taken so long to learn, again, that prohibition doesn't work? In 2005, Denver voters ended cannabis prohibition for small amounts possessed by adults in the city. In 2006, Colorado voters have the chance to do the same thing. Let's uphold our proud tradition as a bellwether state and be the first state to vote to repeal cannabis prohibition and end this failed policy. Bring your friends to the polls on Nov. 7, and vote YES on 44. Laura Kriho Nederland Pubdate - Thu, 12 Oct 2006 Source - Boulder Weekly ( CO ) http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n1385/a06.html?272110
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #28 posted by FoM on October 20, 2006 at 17:46:41 PT
Dankhank
I kept noticing the blond haired man on the prohibitionist side sitting next to the pretty blond republican lady. He was pushing back in the seat and raising his arms in what is the use thinking. Mason and the pretty lady did a great job.PS: I am bad at remembering names but I do remember body language.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #27 posted by Dankhank on October 20, 2006 at 17:38:27 PT
Debate ...
I just watched Mason smash the fools ...here is GOCAM contact page:http://www.stop44.com/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=2&MMN_position=3:3We should all pick a person who spewed bile, including the moderators, and respond to the site and perhaps the TV show with references for the opposite of everything each said.The older woman has the easiest crap to refute, so don't all pick her. :-)
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #26 posted by FoM on October 20, 2006 at 16:58:42 PT
Toker00
Very touching article. This war is so wrong.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #25 posted by Toker00 on October 20, 2006 at 16:43:13 PT
A Brother's Honor.
OT but touching.http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/200601019_after_pats_birthday/Wage Peace on war. END CANNABIS PROHIBITION NOW!
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #24 posted by global_warming on October 20, 2006 at 15:37:20 PT
It will pass
It is the first shot firedIt will pass and the pigs will squeal loudlyIt will pass and this place will forever be rememberedThe place when change came for a safer world
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #23 posted by Rchot on October 20, 2006 at 13:52:49 PT
dongenero
I thought that was a great tactic, when Mason said maybe I am a loser. He knew what the moderators response would be. He also knew the moderators response would anger many viewers. Another good thing was that all the calls were pro pot. At first I thought this measure wouldn't pass but now I am thinking it has a chance. Especially If they keep having debates. 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #22 posted by FoM on October 20, 2006 at 13:41:57 PT
One of Jonathan Adlers Last Posts on CNews
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread20652.shtml#34
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #21 posted by dongenero on October 20, 2006 at 13:29:04 PT
I agree rchot
That moderator was a d! k.At some point the term "loser" came up as description of cannabis users, to which Mason in self deprication said "maybe I'm a loser", or something like that. Of course the moderator kind of snickered.I was thinking, look how much Mason has accomplished 2 years out of college. Then I thought, where did they find this loser moderator? What the hell has he done at 40 some years old?Mason stayed pretty composed and quick of response, which is not easy to do in that situation.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #20 posted by rchot on October 20, 2006 at 13:20:59 PT
the moderator
I was very upset to see the two of the three moderators clearly against amendment 44. I thought that they weren't supposed show biased toward or against. Everytime Mason was on ther verge of bringing it home with a big point they cut him off. Like when he was about to address the %65 of children in rehab for marijuana. I'd bet he was about to ask how many of those children had been put there through the court system. The real question is how many of their parents put them there because it should be the parent who makes that decision. And you should be happy that %65 percent of the children are in their for marijuana would you rather it be meth lol.The older lady also humored me by coming up with data out of nowhere. Marijuana makes you 4 times more violent lol. My comback to that would've been to ask the guy from drug free america if he thought that were true. If he said yes I would've just looked at the camera with that john stewart face.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #19 posted by FoM on October 20, 2006 at 13:11:51 PT
observer
Oh that is terrible news. I wondered where he has been. I feel so bad. 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #18 posted by observer on October 20, 2006 at 13:10:05 PT
Jonathan Adler Dies at the Age of 54 
Jonathan Adler Dies at the Age of 54Found: Fri Oct 20 01:31:10 2006 PDT
Webpage: http://kgmb9.com/kgmb/display.cfm?storyID=9457&sid=1183 A long time advocate for the legalization of medical marijuana has passed away on the Big Island. Jonathan Alder died on Monday at his home in Mountain View. His family says he suffered a series of heart attacks over the past year and a half. Adler founded the Hawaii Institute of Medical Marijuana and ran for governor in the 2002 election before dropping out after being sentenced to prison for drug charges. He was 54 years old. 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #17 posted by unkat27 on October 20, 2006 at 12:17:04 PT
Alcohol = Incompetence Factor
Anyone who has read "The Peter Principle" by Laurence Peters knows about how the factor of incompetence is used by corporations to maintain control over the worker's positions and lives. Incompetence essentially is used by employers to manipulate the competition within the ranks in such a way as to make it work to their advantage.The thing corporate and government executive officers like about alcohol, is how they can use it to destroy people they don't like, without any effort whatsoever. All they have to do is manipulate the ranks under them in such a way as to put the ones they don't like into positions of vulnerability and hope that they succumb to the power of alcohol. Granted, not all their competetive nonfavorites succumb to alcohol, but quite a lot do, and for the big pigs in executive power, that's okay, because it has the effect of cutting down the competition. Whenever someone within their ranks suffers a setback and turns to alcohol, their chances of continuing the "push" to do a good job dwindle and quite often, before they can get themselves going again, alcohol knocks them down into the pits of disgrace.In this way, alcohol acts as a factor for incompetence and makes people weak, and the execs have no problem with that whatsover. In fact, after decades of experience, they have begun to count on it. Alcohol was used in this same way to help defeat the American indians and the imperialist neo-libs are doing the same thing to Muslims in Iraq now.
Peter Principle
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #16 posted by FoM on October 20, 2006 at 11:50:46 PT
ChristenMitchell
Thank you for the information.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #15 posted by Max Flowers on October 20, 2006 at 11:03:14 PT
I like this one a lot
Department of Peace and Nonviolence Act (Kucinich, D-OH)-H.R. 3760. Establishes a U.S. Department of Peace and Nonviolence, as well as a Peace Day. The department would promote "human rights," international conflict prevention, nonviolent intervention, structured mediation, and peaceful conflict resolution....but talk about something that, sadly, will probably never fly in America, the land of guns, bombs and the NFL. 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #14 posted by FoM on October 20, 2006 at 10:37:02 PT
Interesting News I Think
Bill Titles And Their Authors: The Democratic AgendaOctober 20, 2006The Republican Study Committee wants you to know how :"liberal" Democratic members of Congress can bring themselves to be. The group sent its members and members'; staffs an abridged list of bills that Democratic members have introduced in the past two years along with their titles. It's a catchy way to hammer home the "clear difference" that Republicans want their base to notice. Excerpt: States' Rights to Medical Marijuana Act (Frank, D-MA)-H.R. 2087. Allows physicians in states with medical marijuana laws to prescribe marijuana without violating federal law.URL: http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2006/10/bill_titles_and.html
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #13 posted by FoM on October 20, 2006 at 10:24:02 PT
About The Debate
That was the best debate I have ever seen. Amazing. Thank you Mason and the pretty republican lady!
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #12 posted by FoM on October 20, 2006 at 10:05:00 PT
She is Good
I didn't think I'd ever see the day that I thought a Republican could be so good. 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #11 posted by mayan on October 20, 2006 at 09:52:26 PT
FoM
I don't know but she is a true conservative. I'm sure she'll at least make many Colorado republicans consider supporting 44. Between Mason,the blonde,the college vote, and the anti-Walters backlash, Amendment 44 should pass easily! Diebold machines are my only worry.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #10 posted by FoM on October 20, 2006 at 09:48:33 PT
Mason Tvert as Drug Czar in 08!
Mason is the kind of drug czar the new administration will need if we still have to have a drug czar. He really is good.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #9 posted by ChristenMitchell on October 20, 2006 at 09:47:51 PT:
That Pretty Blond Haired Lady
She is the wife of Colorado's top pot lawyer, Robert Corry Jr. He was the first in this state to get his clients MedMj back from the fuzz. And yes, Sam Adams, the potiron graphic was done with MS Picture It.
Hemptopia  Save The Planet-Reduce-Reuse-Recycle-Relegalize
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #8 posted by FoM on October 20, 2006 at 09:27:22 PT
mayan
Where did they get that pretty blond haired lady! Very good!
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #7 posted by FoM on October 20, 2006 at 09:23:50 PT
 mayan 
I'm watching it now.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #6 posted by mayan on October 20, 2006 at 09:13:33 PT
Slam Dunk!
I just watched Wednesday's debate in it's entirety and I must say that Mason totally ripped the anti-44 speakers to shredds. It was pure genius to have a young,intelligent, gorgeous,REPUBLICAN mother in support of 44 sitting next to Mason. What a strategy! Unfortunately, the moderator was obviously against 44 but Mason debated him under the table also! I especially liked it when Mason linked they guy from Florida (can't remember his name) to Straight Inc. Talk about ruffling some feathers! Calvina Faye's name was also brought up then. Slam! Sorry Calvina, we know you're out there. Care to comment? Joyce? Yeah, right.It's a must see debate. Spread it around!
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #5 posted by thestales on October 20, 2006 at 09:12:53 PT
Datura: Off Topic
http://cbs4denver.com/video/?cid=5Uh, Duh!!! War on Plants!! These are spread through texas, cali, AZ, NV, CO and probably anwhere there is not excessive snow. Lets just throw poison to Rid ourselves.And While where at it, lets Put Nutmeg on the Schedule one as well.When will people learn that if you educate your children about plants and animals and the world around them instead of just how to be consumers they won't eat plants that used to be used to turn people into Zombies.But Alas as long as a non-toxic plant like cannabis is prohibited people will continue to try others with drastic consequences.YOU CAN'T WAGE "WAR" on God's plants. You will never when because God is better than you. How many Enthenogenic plants are there in the world? Thousands if not Millions. Lets have a war on them all!!!!!
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #4 posted by FoM on October 20, 2006 at 08:17:17 PT
Ekim
Thank you. Senator Obama was very good on Larry King last night. He is a real diplomat. That's my kind of caring politician. He thinks way deeper then the right. Maybe some people don't worry about being a diplomat but look at how Bush has made us so hated in the world and it's not just his actions but how he talks. 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #3 posted by ekim on October 20, 2006 at 08:03:39 PT
Sen Obama on NPR now
a guest on the Diane Rehm show from 11-12 National Public Radio
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by mayan on October 20, 2006 at 08:00:52 PT
Mason Rocks!
I wouldn't want to be a prohibitionist in Colorado. They are looking awful silly right now!And here's the video of Wednesday's debate on Amendment 44 if it hasn't already been posted. You'll need to copy the whole link...
http://cbs4denver.com/video/?id=23172 kcnc.dayport.comTHE WAY OUT IS THE WAY IN...Former CIA Officer Robert Steele Reviews Webster Tarpley's
'Synthetic Terror': 
http://911blogger.com/node/3897Oklahoma News Papers to run 9/11 Truth Ad:
http://911blogger.com/node/3893View of a Military Expert: Why the Towers of the World Trade Center Collapsed:
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/finn/5/soldier5.htmBelowgroundsurface.org: 9/11 Denial is Over:
http://belowgroundsurface.org/
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by FoM on October 20, 2006 at 07:56:01 PT
 Go Mason
And a big thank you!
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment