cannabisnews.com: Marijuana-rama 










  Marijuana-rama 

Posted by CN Staff on February 01, 2006 at 18:46:29 PT
By Leyna Krow  
Source: Metro Santa Cruz  

Santa Cruz, Calif. -- Will locals vote to put pot-related enforcement at the bottom of the cops' to-do list? The city of Santa Cruz sure does love its dope. At least that's the assumption Santa Cruz Citizens for Sensible Marijuana Policy are banking on as they work to get an initiative on November's ballot that would make marijuana-related crimes the lowest enforcement priority for Santa Cruz police.
"I don't think that responsible adults should be punished for recreational use. And the vast majority of citizens in this city seem to feel the same way," said initiative proponent Craig Reinarman. The initiative follows over a decade's worth of pro-marijuana legislation in the city of Santa Cruz. Measure A, passed in 1992, set the groundwork for medical marijuana cooperatives such as the Wo/Men's Alliance for Medical Marijuana (WAMM). In 2003, following the aptly numbered statewide bill, A.B. 420, which allows cities to set their own regulations regarding just how much pot patients can possess at any one time, the city of Santa Cruz passed an ordinance allowing card-carrying medical marijuana users up to 3 pounds of cannabis. According to Reinarman, "Santa Cruz has voted in the past in very powerful majorities in favor of medical marijuana and decriminalization." This most recent initiative is designed to protect adult users, be they medical marijuana patients or simply recreational enthusiasts, from arrest and prosecution. If enacted, a "community oversight committee" would be formed to which Santa Cruz police would submit biweekly accounts of all marijuana-related arrests. The committee would then decide whether or not the arrest had been in keeping with the spirit of the law. According to Theodora Kerry of Santa Cruz CSMP, "The oversight committee is what will gives this policy teeth. This is what will make police accountable." Offenses not protected by the initiative include selling to minors, sales or distribution on public property, and driving under the influence. Santa Cruz CSMP modeled their initiative after Measure Z, which Oakland passed in 2004. Concerned that tax dollars which could be spent on social programs were instead going to waste enforcing unpopular regulations, the people of Oakland voted by a sizable majority in favor of low priority enforcement of marijuana-related crimes. It is the hope of the Santa Cruz CSMP that Santa Cruz voters will do the same. "This would free up police to focus on legitimate safety concerns in the community," said Kerry. "Nobody is safer because someone doesn't get to smoke a joint tonight." Santa Cruz CSMP will begin collecting signatures for the initiative in early February. Supporters are required to gather 3,423 signatures by April 20, 2006, in order for the initiative to be on the November 2006 ballot. For more information about Santa Cruz Citizens for Sensible Marijuana Policy, call 831.420.2772 or stop by the Compassion Flower Inn at 216 Laurel St., Santa Cruz. From the February 1-8, 2006 issue of Metro Santa Cruz.Source: Metro Santa Cruz (CA)Author: Leyna Krow Published: February 1-8, 2006Copyright: 2006 Metro Publishing Inc.Contact: msc metcruz.comWebsite: http://www.metroactive.com/cruz/Related Articles & Web Site:WAMMhttp://www.wamm.org/Groups Restate Case on Medical Pothttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread21549.shtmlSanta Cruz, ACLU Renew Fight for Med Marijuanahttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread21541.shtml

Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help






 


Comment #8 posted by FoM on February 02, 2006 at 08:27:18 PT

museman
I want to say something to you. I want to thank you for all the wonderful things you are doing with your web site. I really like your picture and I just download one of my all time favorite songs Ohio. Thank you for posting Jerry's movie. I really enjoyed it. I don't understand your faith but I appreciate your input. Are you what is called a Gnostic I think it's called? I believe that we shouldn't allow a church to tell us how we should live. I believe we need to check ourselves and follow our heart. That seems to be more of a Gnostic way of thinking but I really am not sure. Thanks again.
[ Post Comment ]


 


Comment #7 posted by whig on February 02, 2006 at 06:24:31 PT

kaptinemo
Yes, I agree. A better phrasing would be:"I think that responsible adults should not be punished for recreational use. And the vast majority of citizens in this city seem to feel the same way."
[ Post Comment ]


 


Comment #6 posted by kaptinemo on February 02, 2006 at 03:48:29 PT:

Just one little bit of advice, Mr. R
PLEASE stop prefacing your remarks with "I don't think". Do that too often, and some of the ignorant and/or disinterested public will believe that that is a side effect of cannabis usage and believe that you actually *don't* think. As a line from an old INXS song went, "Words as weapons, sharper than knives..." I choose my 'weapons' *very* carefully, to prevent such openings for our opponents to take advantage of. Why make it easy for them?
[ Post Comment ]


 


Comment #5 posted by runderwo on February 01, 2006 at 22:44:03 PT

or, more accurately
Nobody is safer because people smoking their joints tonight are forced to hide it from us while they do it anyway.
[ Post Comment ]


 


Comment #4 posted by Hope on February 01, 2006 at 19:05:46 PT

Sensible.
It is. 
[ Post Comment ]


 


Comment #3 posted by museman on February 01, 2006 at 18:55:33 PT

and another thing
"Nobody is safer because someone doesn't get to smoke a joint tonight." Ain't that the truth?!
[ Post Comment ]


 


Comment #2 posted by museman on February 01, 2006 at 18:53:13 PT

Always liked that town
At last a community seriously approaching the 'problem'
 from a common sense, people based perspective. Applause, Yay, and here's hoping other intelligent communities will follow suit.
[ Post Comment ]



 


Comment #1 posted by FoM on February 01, 2006 at 18:47:31 PT

Go Santa Cruz
I think you're on a roll!
[ Post Comment ]






  Post Comment