cannabisnews.com: Patient Keeps Medical Marijuana Fight Alive





Patient Keeps Medical Marijuana Fight Alive
Posted by CN Staff on November 21, 2004 at 09:32:03 PT
By John A. MacDonald, Courant Staff Writer 
Source: Hartford Courant
Washington -- Angel McClary Raich smokes marijuana every two hours when she is awake. She makes massage oil and balm from marijuana. And she bakes her own marijuana-laced brownies, cakes and cookies, which she eats before going to bed."I am a medical cannabis patient because it is a necessity to keep me from dying," said Raich, a frail 39-year-old Oakland, Calif., mother of two. "Taking a pill would be much easier and would take less time, but I simply do not have that option the way most others do."
For the second time in three years, Raich is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to stop the federal government from cutting off her access to marijuana, which she uses under a doctor's direction to treat pain, nausea and seizures associated with an inoperable brain tumor. Traditional medicines have not brought any relief, she says, and may worsen her condition.In 1996, California became the first state in the nation to pass a law that allows residents to use marijuana for medical purposes. Nine other states have followed, but the federal government has never wavered in its opposition to the state measures.The federal government's view is that Congress passed a law in 1970 strictly regulating the possession and distribution of marijuana. Because the law, the Controlled Substances Act, made no exception for medicinal use of marijuana, that should be the end of the matter, the government contends.The Supreme Court sided with the government three years ago in an 8-0 decision that was a setback for Raich and other California residents who depend on marijuana for medical treatments. Now she is back with a new legal challenge to the government's position."I'm doing this because I want to live," she said. The court will hear arguments in the case Nov. 29.Diane Monson, another California resident and medical marijuana user, has joined Raich in bringing the new case.Analysts agree the case will present the court with difficult issues, but there is no consensus about the outcome."The facts are touching," said former Solicitor General Seth P. Waxman. "But I can't see this court telling [Attorney General] John Ashcroft to keep his hands off these women."Ashcroft has announced his resignation and is not likely to be in office when the court announces its opinion, probably in the spring.Kenneth W. Starr, another former solicitor general, said the case will force the high court to confront the tricky issue of whether state or federal law should prevail when the two are in conflict. The court in recent years has shown considerable deference to the states, but Starr is not sure it will do so in this case."This will be a very exotic situation," Starr said. "It's a deeply, deeply moving human story."Rob Kampia, executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project, a group that supports the medicinal use of marijuana, said the facts of the new case are on Raich's side. "I'd say we have a pretty good shot at winning."The court's decision could well turn on whether the justices decide that Raich's second appeal raises different issues from the first.Not-for-profit cooperatives sprang up in California after voters decided to legalize marijuana when a doctor found it medically necessary. At their peak, the cooperatives were believed to have thousands of members, including Raich, who patronized a cooperative in the Oakland area.The cooperatives were described as a safe and affordable place where patients could buy good-quality marijuana.Even though the debate over whether marijuana has any medicinal value was far from settled, the Supreme Court ruled in May 2001 that Congress had decided "marijuana has no currently medical accepted use" and that the 1970 federal legislation contained no medical exception. The court also indicated it was concerned about the commercial nature of the cooperatives.At the time, Ashcroft called the ruling a "victory for enforcement of our nation's drug laws."In papers filed with the high court in this year's case, acting Solicitor General Paul D. Clement returned to the question about commercial transactions. "Because marijuana trafficking is quintessentially commercial activity," Congress has the right to regulate sales and possession of the drug, whether the transactions occur solely within one state or involve sales across state lines, Clement said.The point may be critical because Raich asserts that her new sources of marijuana - two people known only as John Doe No. 1 and John Doe No. 2 - do not charge her, thus removing any hint of commercial activity, and also operate solely within California."My caregivers grow my medicine specifically for me," Raich says, referring to the Does. "They do not charge me, nor do we trade anything. They grow my medicine and give it to me free of charge."Clement argues that Congress made no distinction in the 1970 measure between the commercial distribution of marijuana within one state or across state lines. He also argues that local manufacture and distribution of marijuana increases the overall supply and can stimulate commercial activity. "Local users may ultimately sell or divert the drug to others," he said in court papers.A federal district judge in California ruled in the government's favor in Raich's second case. But last December a three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district judge. In a 2-1 decision, the appeals judges said "the cultivation, possession and use of marijuana for medical purposes and not for exchange or distribution is not properly characterized as commercial or economic activity."Ashcroft promptly asked the Supreme Court to take up the issue again. Former Solicitor General Theodore B. Olson, who has since returned to private law practice, said the Justice Department acted because the appeals court ruling partially invalidates the 1970s legislation and "substantially undermines" the government's enforcement of federal drug law.The government estimates that marijuana traffickers collect at least $10.5 billion from American users alone, but there is little agreement among experts about its possible beneficial medicinal uses.The National Institute of Drug Abuse, an arm of the federal Department of Health and Human Services, says marijuana use can damage the brain, heart, lungs and immune system and can lead to drug addiction.The Institute of Medicine, part of the National Academy of Sciences, says that marijuana is "potentially effective" in treating pain, nausea, anorexia, AIDS wasting and other symptoms. The institute has urged further tests of marijuana's medicinal uses, but cautioned that potential beneficial effects are undermined by the fact that patients must inhale "harmful" smoke.The nine states that have joined California in approving medical uses of marijuana are Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont and Washington. Kampia, the Marijuana Policy Project leader, asserts the state actions show growing public support of medicinal marijuana. Montana, the latest state to join the list, is conservative but also takes a "leave-us-alone" attitude toward the government in Washington.Connecticut passed a law in 1981 making it legal for doctors to prescribe marijuana for medicinal use, but a conflict with the federal law makes the state measure unworkable. At least four legislative efforts to resolve the conflict have failed.At her home in Oakland, Raich looks at the issue in personal terms. She uses about 2.5 ounces of marijuana a week. If she loses the current case, she may have to leave the country, she said, even though that could separate her from her two teenage children."I know I am taking a huge risk by talking publicly about my medical cannabis use," she said. "I am in no way going to stop using cannabis. I am fighting to stay alive." Source: Hartford Courant (CT)Author: John A. MacDonald, Courant Staff Writer Published: November 21, 2004 Copyright: 2004 The Hartford CourantContact: letters courant.comWebsite: http://www.ctnow.com/Related Articles & Web Sites:Raich vs. Ashcroft http://www.angeljustice.org/Angel Raich v. Ashcroft Newshttp://freedomtoexhale.com/raich.htmFederal Government, Butt Out of Med Marijuanahttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread19843.shtmlHigh Court's Case To Affect Med Marijuana Lawshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread19834.shtmlFighting for The Right To Miracle Marijuanahttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread19811.shtml 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #7 posted by ekim on November 21, 2004 at 20:27:27 PT
how many USA Docs signed petition for the S. C .
if 1000 have signed in Ill how many are there in the USA.I would like to know if there are any on record here in MI. and what kind of merit is given to Veterinarians in Medicine.Dr. Bruce Doblin of Evanston testified that marijuana is not addictive, but patients could become dependent on its extraordinary pain relief. He said nearly 1,000 Illinois doctors have signed a petition in support of the legislation. http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread19845.shtmlfyi-----i received a hemp shirt a while back and have been wearing it some. i like to have people read the little tag in the back of the collar. 
it says----100 % Hemp. grown, woven, and sown in China. This S.C. case is not only about Med use of Cannabis but is about making the USA more able to sustain its self. If in fact we are moving to a Global Market it is imperative that we compete on a even playing field which includes the Land and Factories and the Universities and its Hospitals.
http://www.leap.cc/events
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #6 posted by global_warming on November 21, 2004 at 14:15:17 PT
Facts Should Be Considered
"The facts are touching," said former Solicitor General Seth P. Waxman. "But I can't see this court telling [Attorney General] John Ashcroft to keep his hands off these women."Facts, now there is something to reckon with..Should the Supreme Court rule against this skinny little women, "I am a medical cannabis patient because it is a necessity to keep me from dying," said Raich, a frail 39-year-old Oakland, Calif., mother of two. "Taking a pill would be much easier and would take less time, but I simply do not have that option the way most others do.".. Though frail and in pain, this little person, this girl, this women, has summoned up enough strength and courage to go face to face with this monster behemoth government of ours, and though most civilized human beings would accept the fact that some people can find a balm and salve from the use of this most ancient of remedies, yet in spite of the compelling and touching facts that "Solicitor General Seth P. Waxman" understands, this Supreme Court, this government, might deny this women here medicine, and will force her into exile.I for one, cannot believe that decent people would stand in the way of this women, I believe that even the majority that voted for Bush are good god fearing human beings, and in spite of this corrupted election, that most people seek peace and truth.gw
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #5 posted by freedom23 on November 21, 2004 at 14:12:05 PT
OT: PBS and MM
PBS' show "Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly" is doing an episode on medical marijuana. They interview Valerie and Mike Corral. Check out: http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week812/cover.htmlI haven't seen it yet so I don't know how accurate or fair it is.There's a link on the page to find out when your local PBS station will be airing the show.
"Bullsh*t: Penn & Teller" vs the War on Drugs
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #4 posted by goneposthole on November 21, 2004 at 12:14:59 PT
instant army for the empire
The two million prisoners that inhabit our penal system could be inducted into the armed services and shipped over to the middle east. The prison guards can be made the officers. Problem solved.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #3 posted by mayan on November 21, 2004 at 12:04:40 PT
Hope I'm Wrong
"The facts are touching," said former Solicitor General Seth P. Waxman. "But I can't see this court telling [Attorney General] John Ashcroft to keep his hands off these women."Ashcroft has announced his resignation and is not likely to be in office when the court announces its opinion, probably in the spring.I can't see this court ruling against the Bush regime either. The Republicans have the White House,Congress,the Supreme Court and now our intelligence agencies. We're pretty much screwed. Besides, by the time a decision is reached there could very well be another staged terror attack, a draft and martial law. It doesn't look good.Below is an incredible link. Scroll all the way down and one can see that it is clearly not Bin Laden in the pre-election video! The entire war on terror is fake...The 2004 October Surprise Video is fake!
http://www.welfarestate.com/binladen/surprise/The way out is the way in...9/11 Was An Inside Job - A Call to All True Patriots:
http://www.911sharethetruth.com/
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by E_Johnson on November 21, 2004 at 09:54:58 PT
Protection from the protectors
Current editorial in the Pasadena Star-News:A recent internal review out of the sheriff's department was shocking in its reporting of the extent and types of willful misconduct among deputies. No mere missteps, some behavior constituted criminal acts.The most egregious incidents reported by the Office of Independent Review involved two deputies indicted in August for using the threat of arrest to coerce victims into sexual acts.Add to what is essentially rape a large number of off-duty deputies arrested on felony DUI along with cases of road rage and fights and a disturbing picture emerges. That molesters and drunk drivers are part of the rank-in-file these days calls into question the type of screening used in hiring and whether sufficient counseling is offered those on the job.http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/Stories/0,1413,206~11851~2548375,00.html
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by FoM on November 21, 2004 at 09:48:15 PT
Heads Up: PBS on Medical Marijuana
On Direct TV at 2 PM ET on our local channels this program will air. I don't know if it will be on other PBS channels but I thought I'd mention it incase others might want to watch it.PBS: Religion & Ethics: Medical Marijuana: http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread19847.shtml
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment