cannabisnews.com: Marijuana Measures Pass Handily 





Marijuana Measures Pass Handily 
Posted by CN Staff on November 03, 2004 at 12:44:34 PT
By Dave Moore of the Tribune’s Staff 
Source: Columbia Daily Tribune 
Columbia voters did a dramatic about-face on marijuana yesterday, approving two measures that forbid police from arresting people for possessing small amounts of the drug. Two ballot measures, which mirror a similar measure that failed 10,461-7,629 in April 2003, easily passed during yesterday’s voting deluge.Proposition 1, which allows seriously ill adults to use marijuana with permission from their physicians, passed with 32,945, or 69 percent, of the votes, compared with 14,541 votes against.
Proposition 2, which limits all small-quantity marijuana arrests to a maximum $250 fine in municipal court with no criminal record, passed with 61 percent of the vote, 28,723-18,544."I have some cases in court tomorrow where this could apply," said Dan Viets, a Columbia lawyer and member of Columbia Alliance for Patients and Education, or CAPE, which obtained the 2,275 valid signatures needed to place the issue on yesterday’s ballot. Viets spoke at about 10 p.m., with about 60 percent of the vote in, to CAPE members gathered at The Old Heidelberg last night.The measures deal with possession of up to 1¼ ounces of marijuana and call on city prosecutors to direct offenders to drug education classes or community service rather than issue fines. Promoters of the propositions pushed to place the issues on yesterday’s ballot because of the heavy voter turnout general elections bring. Earlier marijuana votes occurred during off-season elections. In addition to the April 2003 measure, a similar proposal lost in 1985 by 828 votes - 57 percent to 43 percent.Last night, Viets expressed surprise that both measures passed by such wide margins. But the political landscape differed dramatically from earlier elections. In spring 2003, both the federal government and the federally funded Missouri Association of Community Task Forces lined up to attack the proposition, which would have eased marijuana laws in a similar fashion to Proposition 1 and Proposition 2. CAPE, meanwhile, attracted $50,000 in donations from the Washington, D.C.- based Marijuana Policy Project and used the money to advertise the two propositions.Also, drives to encourage people to vote attracted voters who helped pass the initiatives, said Amanda Broz, treasurer of CAPE. She said the issue attracted several crossover Republicans who voted for Bush-Cheney on the presidential ticket."It’s an issue of privacy rights," Broz said. "A person should be able to put into their body what they want to, as long as it doesn’t harm somebody else."Columbia Police Chief Randy Boehm spoke against the ballot initiatives, saying their passage would send a signal that it’s OK to smoke marijuana, but he didn’t actively campaign against the measure."I’m disappointed, but our job is to enforce the law as it is," Boehm said. "The community has spoken, so that’s what we’re going to do. I’ve spoken to both the city law department and the prosecuting attorney, and there will be a meeting in the next few days regarding how the misdemeanor marijuana cases will be handled."A precinct-by-precinct review shows nearly a complete reversal of the community’s position on marijuana. In April 2003, the marijuana proposition lost in 29 of 44 Columbia precincts; it was soundly defeated in every precinct in the Second and Fifth wards.This year, the medical marijuana proposition won in every precinct, and Proposition 2 lost by narrow margins in only eight precincts. Both measures gained strong support in the Third Ward at Memorial Baptist Church on Paris Road, where the April 2003 measure narrowly won. Source: Columbia Daily Tribune (MO)Author: Dave Moore of the Tribune’s Staff Published: Wednesday, November 3, 2004Copyright: 2004 Columbia Daily TribuneContact: editor tribmail.comWebsite: http://www.columbiatribune.com/Related Articles & Web Sites:Missouri NORMLhttp://www.gstlnorml.org/Marijuana Policy Projecthttp://www.mpp.org/Both Pot Propositions Pass by a Large Marginhttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread19763.shtmlPrescription Pothttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread19704.shtmlPot Advocates Hope Third Try Proves Charm http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread19696.shtml
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #2 posted by unkat27 on November 03, 2004 at 19:57:19 PT
BC dreamin
Now that the fascist chimp has been re-elected, I'll be movin to Canada. I have relatives in Ontario, but BC looks real good.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by Siege on November 03, 2004 at 14:31:38 PT
The different
The different between Cailf. City Attorney ON Measure Z And (MO) Proposition 1 and Proposition 2 Boehm said. ""The community has spoken"", so that’s what we’re going to do. but Not City Attorney John Russo. to challenge it in court. and both where voted in by the people.
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment