cannabisnews.com: Tax The Dope Trade, Alderman Suggests 





Tax The Dope Trade, Alderman Suggests 
Posted by CN Staff on October 22, 2004 at 08:03:13 PT
By Fran Spielman, City Hall Reporter 
Source: Chicago Sun-Times 
Just when you thought Mayor Daley's menu of tax increases included just about every item under the sun, a Northwest Side alderman has another novel idea that's certain to raise eyebrows: slap cigarette-style tax stamps on narcotics.Ald. Ted Matlak (32nd) wants to make it perfectly clear that he is not in favor of legalizing marijuana or any other drugs. He simply wants the city to make money off the drug activity that does exist.
By hitting drug dealers and their customers where it hurts -- in their wallets -- he's also hoping to send a message loud and clear: Don't pollute Chicago neighborhoods."If you're a suburbanite and you get hit with a gigantic penalty from the city for buying narcotics and the word gets around that the guy down the street had a big problem, maybe they won't be coming into these neighborhoods to buy drugs anymore. It's a law enforcement tool as well as a revenue generator," Matlak said."Say you're a social drug user. If you come in and [buy drugs from] an undercover officer, we'll file criminal charges and all that. Then, we'll look at them and say, 'OK, where's your thousand dollar tax stamp?' Same as cigarettes. Now, we have a civil liability against you for buying something that doesn't have tax stamps on it."The precise cost of the narcotics tax stamps is still being researched. Matlak would only say that it would be levied against the buyer and the seller -- whoever is caught -- and that it would be based on the amount of drugs in that person's possession.The Chicago Sun-Times reported last month that Wentworth Sgt. Tom Donegan is pushing a plan to ticket people caught with small amounts of marijuana -- anywhere from $250 for 10 grams of pot to $1,000 for 20 to 30 grams -- because he's fed up with making arrests, only to have judges dismiss the charges.Donegan estimated the financially strapped city budget could have raked in $5 million in fines in 2003 alone by ticketing marijuana users.Mayor Daley promptly embraced the idea, arguing it makes little sense to keep piling up arrests for marijuana use when "99 percent" of the cases are dismissed. Judges apparently have so little regard for the cases, many defendants don't even bother showing up in court, he said.The mayor flatly denied the idea was tantamount to decriminalizing marijuana use."It's decriminalized now. They throw all the cases out,'' he said, referring to the courts.Law Department spokeswoman Jennifer Hoyle said City Hall is still researching Donegan's idea. She had not heard about Matlak's even more controversial approach.Matlak said the two ideas are not mutually exclusive. They can work in tandem to generate revenue and discourage drug activity."I'm in favor of that, too," he said. "Instead of taking somebody with a small amount of narcotics and tying up jail space and police officers. Every time you arrest somebody, they have to process it. I'd rather see them out there fighting crime, than being tied up on smaller cases."Source: Chicago Sun-Times (IL)Author:  Fran Spielman, City Hall Reporter Published: October 22, 2004Copyright: 2004 The Sun-Times Co.Contact: letters suntimes.comWebsite: http://www.suntimes.com/Related Articles & Web Sites:Decrim Watchhttp://www.decrimwatch.com/Illinois NORMLhttp://www.illinoisnorml.org/Area Police Use Local Law in Marijuana Caseshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread19681.shtmlSanity In Chicagohttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread19568.shtmlChicago Wants Laissez-Faire Approach To MJhttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread19554.shtml
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #5 posted by Sam Adams on October 22, 2004 at 13:53:17 PT
Inching closer
Like a blind man searching for his dropped cane, these imbeciles stagger around in the dark, gradually approaching the logical solution.Fine people, no wait tax them, no tax the ones that are caught, wait, fine AND tax them-or, just legalize it and tax everyone! Make a bundle of money, SAVE a bundle of money in LEO costs! Oh my god, I could get the Nobel Prize for this!
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #4 posted by cloud7 on October 22, 2004 at 12:49:50 PT
...
"a Northwest Side alderman has another novel idea that's certain to raise eyebrows: slap cigarette-style tax stamps on narcotics."Everytime I read about some lord trying to enact this "novel" idea, I cant help but think of the versatility of hemp rope. 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #3 posted by JR Bob Dobbs on October 22, 2004 at 12:47:54 PT
"Don't pollute Chicago neighborhoods"
Perhaps they should tell that to the major corporations who are polluting our ecology so badly that our air quality gets a "D-" rating... on a GOOD day.Instead of raising a lot of money from the few people that get caught, why not raise a little money from every single transaction? All it would take is legal regulation...I've said it before and I'm starting to tire of saying it... you'd think, of all places, Chicago would have a unique perspective into the real-world effectiveness of prohibition. How quickly they forget.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by siege on October 22, 2004 at 10:41:57 PT
               social drug
How many are going to get poped((undercover officer,))?? before they wake up, It won't be the( social drug user doing it). It will be the ones they/you are cuting 
into that are going to get combatant, so you/they have just started a real War. And how many carrying and buryings are there going to be, of the INNOCENT that are in the Way. wake up Ald. Ted Matlak is this what you really want for your city. [Baby face Nelison or Al Capone maybe Frank Gallucio, Big Jim Colosimo Days] I hope not!
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by afterburner on October 22, 2004 at 08:33:23 PT
Standard Political Disclaimer 2004
*While I am not in favor of legalizing marijuana [sic - racial slur], I would like to tax the "hell" out of it instead of arresting and jailing people.* How noble! But what is the moral justification for punishing non-violent users of a spiritual, social and medicinal plant? What is their crime??? Dope [sic - another pejorative term, designed to associate mildly psychedelic cannabis with highly addictive opiates]
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment