cannabisnews.com: The Medical Marijuana Wins





The Medical Marijuana Wins
Posted by CN Staff on December 21, 2003 at 07:44:07 PT
By Carl F. Worden 
Source: Sierra Times 
The recent medical marijuana decision issued by the federal Ninth Circuit Court enforces a state’s right to overrule the federal Controlled Substances Act of 1970 if certain conditions are met with regard to marijuana use that is recommended by a physician. Among others, one of the conditions the judges stipulated is that the marijuana must not be sold. To a sharp defense attorney, that stipulation is significant and potentially more far-reaching than the Ninth Circuit may have intended. I will explain.
In order to justify the federal War on Drugs, the federal government has always claimed that the perpetually abused Commerce Clause gives them the authority to enforce federal drug laws, because “drugs are sold”, and therefore fall into the category of commerce. Any thinking person knows the Founding Fathers never intended that, but the feds have gotten away with that chicanery for 34 years without any real serious challenge to their premise. I have a niggling feeling that’s about to change. Frankly, I’m surprised the Commerce Clause hasn’t been used by the federal government to usurp the entire balance of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, since we are a capitalist nation and just about everything we do and make can be had for a price. Heck, we could start with prostitution and move on from there to your kid’s lemonade stand. But this ruling by the Ninth Circuit seems significant because it indicates that at least two of the three judges considering the matter of state-sanctioned medical marijuana, recognized an absence of federal authority if the marijuana has not been acquired through “commerce”. Hmm, what about other drugs? Let’s carry this a bit further. In order for the feds to enforce federal drug laws, there has been an unchallenged assumption in each prosecution that commerce was somehow involved. But I can’t think of any federal drug prosecution that has ever been required to prove commerce was involved before the case could proceed to trial. It seems reasonable that if federal drug prosecutors are going to hide behind the specious and dishonest Commerce Clause argument, then they should be required to prosecute within the limitations that argument represents. Ergo, if the feds can’t prove commerce was involved, they don’t have jurisdiction. While an illegal drug manufacturer or drug dealer might be an easier mark for federal drug law prosecution, what about the person convicted under federal drug law for merely being in possession? Couldn’t that person argue before the same Ninth Circuit that he was freely given the substance in question, and therefore not subject to federal prosecution for lack of a “commerce” circumstance? Think about it. It has always bugged me that Congress correctly required itself to pass a constitutional amendment giving the federal government authority to prosecute the War on Booze during Prohibition, but then blithely excused itself from that requirement when they wanted to prosecute the War on Drugs. If I recall correctly, illicit booze was also “sold”, so why didn’t Congress cite the Commerce Clause as their authority to prosecute federal prohibition laws back then? The answer is obvious, and the hypocrisy and speciousness of the Commerce Clause argument is therefore glaring. It is high time to put a stop to it, and this Ninth Circuit Court ruling might be a good first step. Source: Sierra Times.com (NV)Author:  Carl F. WordenPublished: December 21, 2003Copyright: 2003 SierraTimes.com Contact: opeds sierratimes.com Website: http://www.sierratimes.com/Related Articles & Web Site:Raich v. Ashcroft in PDFhttp://freedomtoexhale.com/ruling.pdfWhere’s The Compassion?http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread18003.shtmlFederalism Wins - National Reviewhttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread18002.shtmlA Landmark Victory - Ann Harrison http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread17996.shtml 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #3 posted by Truth on December 21, 2003 at 11:18:59 PT
nice
Great letter jose
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by jose melendez on December 21, 2003 at 10:22:37 PT
bold LTE
from: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v03/n1957/a10.html?1107MANY STUDIES PROVE VALUE OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA Drug warriors say that there are no studies proving that cannabis has therapeutic value, yet our own scheduling of cannabis has made it all but impossible to study.  How convenient. There is plenty of research available.  Here are just a few examples of studies proving Terrence Farley, Ocean County first assistant prosecutor, wrong.  There are, of course, many more. "2003 Marijuana and Its Receptor Protein in Brain Control Epilepsy" -- Robert J.  DeLorenzo, M.D, PhD - Virginia Commonwealth University Department of Neurology. "2003 Cannabinoids Prevent Seizures" - Dr.  Giovanni Marsicano, of the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry in Munich, Germany. "2002 Inhibition of Skin Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis in vivo by Activation of Cannabinoid Receptors" - Manuel Guzman, Madrid, Spain. "1999 The Accumulated Data Indicate a Potential Therapeutic Value for Cannabinoid Drugs" - IOM Report by the National Academy of Science. We are now getting reports of studies from several nations, including our own, confirming the successful use of cannabinoids to treat muscular sclerosis, epilepsy, cancer and other sicknesses. Other nations are distributing cannabis and cannabis-based medications via prescription and compassion clubs to those who benefit from its use. In America, we incarcerate those who try to alleviate their pain and suffering by using cannabis. It's no coincidence that our brain is filled with cannabinoid receptors. Humans were meant to use this natural medicine and our government will one day be held accountable for prosecuting sick and dying Americans. - snipped
Corrupt? Repent! Join http://www.leap.cc
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by sukoi on December 21, 2003 at 09:10:01 PT
A few articles
Appeals Court Faces Unresolved Issue of Medical Marijuana Sales
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/uniontrib/sun/news/news_1n21medpot.htmlSense and Sinsemilla
http://www.dailycamera.com/bdc/editorials/article/0,1713,BDC_2489_2516052,00.htmlThe Great Marijuana Ddebate
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1071961807577&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968793972154
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment