cannabisnews.com: Supreme Court Halts Pot Appeals 










  Supreme Court Halts Pot Appeals 

Posted by CN Staff on December 14, 2002 at 08:39:12 PT
By Tonda MacCharles, Ottawa Bureau 
Source: Toronto Star  

In a highly unusual move, the Supreme Court of Canada refused yesterday to proceed with three constitutional appeals to Canada's pot law because Justice Minister Martin Cauchon says he is on the verge of decriminalizing marijuana.One after another, several of Canada's top judges grilled federal lawyer David Frankel, who wanted to go ahead and defend the criminal law that outlaws simple possession and argue that marijuana is a harmful substance.
But the judges interjected that Cauchon has said the law's penalties are too harsh and its enforcement too uneven, and appeared baffled by Frankel's explanations that the minister was expressing "a personal view."Cauchon has said a lifelong criminal record that often leaves young people unable to travel to the U.S. or take up certain jobs is too great a penalty. Committees of the Senate and the Commons have said the same thing, and both have urged relaxing the criminal sanctions, although to different degrees.Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin said a key question in the appeals is whether the harm to society or any person by the use of marijuana is sufficient to permit criminalization, and the upcoming examination by Parliament "may well prove to be of relevance to the case, and of interest to the parties, and it may provide guidance to the courts in deciding the present appeals."After less than an hour of argument, and consultation by the judges, McLachlin adjourned the three appeals to the court's spring session, adding their decision "expresses no view on the issues before us."Lawyers for the three individuals challenging the law — two from B.C. and one from Ontario — had also wanted to proceed, heartened by Cauchon's comments that seemed to back their view that the criminalization of marijuana use infringes their right to life, liberty and security of the person.But they were equally heartened by the court's view that the stakes were high.Lawyer Paul Burstein represented former London resident Chris Clay, who was convicted for selling marijuana seeds and seedlings in 1995. Yesterday, he said the court's decision wasn't perhaps a rebuke, but was definitely a signal to the government to clarify its position on the law. Complete Title: Supreme Court Halts Pot Appeals Amid Debate Over LawSource: Toronto Star (CN ON)Author: Tonda MacCharles, Ottawa BureauPublished: December 14, 2002Copyright: 2002 The Toronto Star Contact: lettertoed thestar.com Website: http://www.thestar.com/ Related Articles & Web Sites:The Compassion Clubhttp://www.thecompassionclub.org/Cannabis News Canadian Linkshttp://freedomtoexhale.com/can.htmSupreme Court Delays Pot Appealhttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread14978.shtmlHigh Court Marijuana Case in Limbohttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread14971.shtmlFormer London Hemp Activist Gets Day in Courthttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread14962.shtml

Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help









 


Comment #2 posted by Truth on December 14, 2002 at 09:24:19 PT

save lives
If "Life" was prioratized the prohibition swap would be great. Unfortunately their bottom line means more.
[ Post Comment ]


 


Comment #1 posted by The GCW on December 14, 2002 at 09:05:26 PT

Ohhhh, Cannada
But the judges interjected that Cauchon has said the law's penalties are too harsh and its enforcement too uneven, and appeared baffled by Frankel's explanations that the minister was expressing "a personal view."RIGHT ON, RIGHT ON, DUDE!One after another...And then, there's, David Frankel, who wanted to go ahead and defend the criminal law that outlaws simple possession and argue that marijuana is a harmful substance (THAT REQUIRES THE USER BE CAGED??? WHAT AN OVER INDULGENT URINE SUCKER). &&&
the upcoming examination by Parliament "may well prove to be of relevance to the case, and of interest to the parties, and it may provide guidance to the courts in deciding the present appeals." (CAN the parliamentary report now be used as court evidence? YES!?)Canada should be highly commended. Yes, the laws pertaining to the superplant, should go farther, but this is the direction it must turn to, which is to stop the senseless cagings, before We can proceed to the next level.It is said that Americans are addicted to prohibitions, so perhaps We should prepare for not an end to prohibition, but a swap. Yes a prohibition switch, exchanging nic and booze for THC. A little Tricky Dicky.
[ Post Comment ]





  Post Comment