cannabisnews.com: Medicinal Pot Users Renew Legal Challenge
Medicinal Pot Users Renew Legal Challenge
Posted by CN Staff on October 10, 2002 at 07:23:53 PT
By Dan Reed, Mercury News
Source: San Jose Mercury News
Regrouped and armed with new tactics, two Bay Area attorneys on Wednesday again sued the U.S. government over its campaign to quash the use of medicinal marijuana, now legal in eight states, including California.Lawyers Robert Raich and David Michael, flanked by their clients, two marijuana users who say the weed eases their serious ailments, told reporters in Oakland that they'd defined constitutional issues that will help them prevail where their last lawsuit failed. That complaint journeyed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court before being denied last year.
In that suit, the court ruled in May 2001 that the Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative had no right to sell marijuana to the ill, even though such sales are legal with a doctor's recommendation under California's medicinal marijuana law, approved by voters in 1996. Seven states followed with similar laws.But the Supreme Court concluded federal law supersedes. Even so, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that some constitutional issues remained unresolved, such as the federal government's right to interfere with intrastate commerce and a citizen's right to use marijuana to relieve pain.It's those crevices in the decision that Raich and Michael are now trying to exploit.This time, no complicating factors, such as distribution of marijuana by a cannabis club, are clouding ``over the pure issues that we are presenting here,'' Michael said. ``This case is clean.''In part, their arguments will remind people of their civics lessons in federalism, the distribution of power between the federal and state governments. For example, the attorneys contend that the federal government's meddling in marijuana sales that never cross state lines is a violation of the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution.The suit, filed against Attorney General John Ashcroft and Asa Hutchinson, the chief of the Drug Enforcement Administration, charges that the continued attacks on medicinal marijuana users and suppliers also violate the Fifth, Ninth and 10th Amendments. It asks the court to stop the government from enforcing the federal marijuana laws against the plaintiffs -- Diane Monson and Angel McClary Raich (who married her attorney two months ago) and two John Does, listed anonymously because they're Angel Raich's marijuana providers.Monson grows her own, but Butte County Sheriff's deputies and DEA agents ripped up her six plants in August, she said.In addition to federalism and the commerce clause, the attorneys are arguing a constitutional right to preserve and prolong one's life and a common-law doctrine of medical necessity.The San Francisco U.S. Attorney's and DEA offices declined to comment on the case, their typical policy on pending litigation.Richard Meyer, a special agent for the DEA, said his agency supports scientific research into the potential benefits of marijuana, but for now sees it as addictive and harmful. ``It is a dangerous drug,'' he said Wednesday. ``It has no recognized medical use and a high potential for abuse.''He'll never convince Monson and Angel Raich of that.Monson said it's the only thing that effectively helps her chronic back pain. Prescription drugs, she said, just make her drowsy. Neither patient gets much of a buzz off the weed, possibly because they have to use it so regularly -- every two hours for Angel Raich.Angel Raich offered a list of ailments worthy of a medical textbook: inoperable brain tumor, seizures, endometriosis, scoliosis and a wasting disorder. She weighs only 97 pounds and said without pot she'd starve to death.Both declared they'd continue to light up, no matter what the government says.``I'm not willing to give up my life,'' Angel Raich said.Source: San Jose Mercury News (CA)Author: Dan Reed, Mercury NewsPublished: Thursday, October 10, 2002Copyright: 2002 San Jose Mercury NewsContact: letters sjmercury.comWebsite: http://www.sjmercury.com/ Related Articles & Web Site:OCBChttp://www.rxcbc.org/Medical Marijuana Users Sue Federal Officialshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread14398.shtmlThe Supreme Court Rules on Medical Marijuana http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread9794.shtmlAmerica's Last Dance with Mary Jane? http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread9783.shtml
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help
Comment #1 posted by knox42897 on October 10, 2002 at 08:01:16 PT:
PROTEST RALLY TODAY
Who: NRLE, the campaign to pass Question 9What: A rally to support Question 9. Assemblywoman Chris Giunchiliangi will
be tapping a segment opposite the Federal Drug Czar on John
Ralston's show, "day one" on channel 8.When: THURSDAY, October 10, 2002. 11:00 a.m. PRESS EVENT.
Supporters please arrive by 10:15 a.m.Where: Near the Channel 8 Studios. 3228 Channel 8 Drive, the cross streets
are paradise and convention center drive. We will meet outside the
parking garage and assemble on the sidewalk near the studios. We will
validate your parking ticket.Why: To show our support for Question 9 and courageous spokespeople like
Assemblywoman Chris Giunchigliani. Nevadans DON'T appreciate the
Federal Government coming into our state and telling us how to vote on
Question 9. This is YOUR chance to be part of this historic effort. Look
professional-- the dress is business casual. We will have signs on hand
for supports to wave.
[ Post Comment ]
Post Comment