cannabisnews.com: DeConcini Says He Can't Support Proposition





DeConcini Says He Can't Support Proposition
Posted by CN Staff on August 18, 2002 at 15:06:39 PT
By Howard Fischer, Capitol Media Services
Source: Arizona Daily Sun
Former U.S. Sen. Dennis DeConcini said Wednesday he cannot support Proposition 203 even though he likes the idea of reducing the penalty for possession of marijuana. DeConcini, a former Pima County Attorney, backed the original 1996 initiative to liberalize the state's drug laws. This year's measure also expands the 1996 law which allows those with a medical reason to possess the drug without fear of any law enforcement action. DeConcini said that, too, is a worthwhile goal. 
What annoys DeConcini is a provision which lets people with a medical excuse get their marijuana from the Department of Public Safety. "I think that's a huge mistake to place that burden on a law enforcement agency," the former senator said. DeConcini said that, had he been asked to help craft this year's version, "I would have made some strong suggestions and I might have supported it, because I don't have objections to decriminalizing it for medical use only." The 1996 measure specifies that those arrested on possession of small amounts of drugs cannot be sent to prison for a first or second offense. Instead a judge is supposed to put that person on probation and tell them to get treatment. That same law permits doctors to prescribe otherwise illegal drugs to terminal and seriously ill patients. That provision has not been used because the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency threatened to revoke the federal prescription writing privileges of physicians who acted under the law. This year's version seeks to get around that by saying those with a doctor's recommendation -- short of a formal prescription -- can possess marijuana without fear of prosecution. They could get their drugs from DPS. "They're the ones who confiscate it," said Sam Vagenas, who is coordinating the initiative. And they would continue to do that, even if the initiative passes: Possession would remain illegal for those without a doctor's permission, though the penalty for two ounces or less would be a $250 fine. Vagenas said he doubts that DeConcini's change of heart would have a big effect on voter support for this year's measure. He pointed out the initiative has the support of others, including former Attorney General Grant Woods. But it does not have the backing of Janet Napolitano, Woods' successor -- and for some of the same reasons as DeConcini. "Quite frankly, the Department of Public Safety doesn't have the resources to do it's fundamental job which is to patrol the highways and protect the public safety," she said. "The notion that they're going to be now the marijuana distributor for the state is a dilution of resources that is not well taken." Napolitano said that the drug laws on the books -- including the 1996 initiative -- should be allowed to work. That stance, she acknowledged, also puts her at odds with Maricopa County Attorney Rick Romley and Pima County Attorney Barbara LaWall. They are pushing Proposition 302 which seeks to alter than 1996 law to allow the incarceration of those who refuse to participate in drug treatment programs. "We have to give our courts and our probation officers some tools," said LaWall. Note:  Backers of an initiative to further liberalize the state's drug laws have lost a key ally. Complete Title: DeConcini Says He Can't Support Proposition to Reduce Penalty for Marijuana Possession Source: Arizona Daily Sun (AZ)Author: Howard Fischer, Capitol Media ServicesPublished: August 15, 2002Copyright: 2002 Arizona Daily SunContact: azdsopinion azdailysun.comWebsite: http://www.azdailysun.com/Related Articles:Candidate Backs Initiative To Liberalize Pot Lawhttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread13788.shtmlGubernatorial Candidate Endorses Drug Initiativehttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread13779.shtml
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #1 posted by ekim on August 18, 2002 at 18:53:24 PT
203 good 202 baaaaaad
Man this is gonna be sweet. Am still waiting for bookies to make the NV numbers. When the tax is tallied look out Woods' successor --- people will want that tax, and vote to regulate. 
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment