Cannabis News Protecting Patients Access to Medical Marijuana
  The War On Drugs Is An Infringement on Liberty
Posted by FoM on October 27, 2000 at 20:03:16 PT
By Donovan Bramwell 
Source: Idaho State Journal 

justice There are lots of good reasons for ending prohibition of illicit drugs. Constraints of time and space do not allow me to list them all here, or to offer more than a little explanation. What I do offer in this article is a quick list of good reasons, in no particular sequence, except that I save the most important one for last. I focus on marijuana, but what I say applies mostly to other illicit drugs as well. Here's the list:

Prohibition creates more problems than it solves. This was true during the Prohibition Era (the prohibition of alcohol in the 1920s), and it is true of the modern prohibition of marijuana and other illicit drugs today.

Prohibition creates victimless crimes. In and of itself, drug use is innocent-it does not represent an act of aggression or fraud against another person.

Prohibition does not work. People continue to use and sell illicit drugs on the black market. The availability of drugs is mostly unaffected by prohibition. Prohibition succeeds only in artificially raising the market price, thus distorting normal market forces.

Prohibition is a waste of tens of billions of taxpayer dollars.

Prohibition makes criminals rich.

Prohibition fosters violence in the streets as black market drug suppliers fight over turf (markets made artificially lucrative by prohibition).

Prohibition causes juveniles to be excessively vulnerable to unwise drug use. Black market drug dealers don't ask for identification to verify age.

Prohibition moves the illegal drug market toward drugs that are more concentrated and more dangerous, that is, drugs that are easier to hide. For example, from marijuana to crack and meth.

Prohibition destroys families (in ways far more harmful and far more serious than drug use does). A pot-smoking mom gets a 10-year sentence, and her two young children end up in foster homes.

Prohibition makes drug overdoses and poisonings more likely to occur. Black market drug dealers have no incentive to truthfully label their products as to content, concentration, purity, or dosage. Victims have no legal recourse without exposing themselves to prosecution.

Prohibition teaches disrespect for the law and mistrust of the government.

Prohibition prevents use of marijuana in its traditional, beneficial applications as an herbal remedy for treating insomnia, drug addiction, appetite loss, depression, and other maladies, and in its modern application as a treatment for the side effects of chemotherapy in cancer patients. The same kind of thing is true of some other naturally derived and chemically derived drugs that are currently illegal. (Meanwhile, big corporations get rich marketing their patented, acceptable alternatives.)

Prohibition creates an agenda for interfering wrongly and unnecessarily in the affairs of other nations, for example, sending military equipment and advisors to Columbia.

Prohibition wastes the resources (money, time, and space) of the police, the courts, and the prisons-resources that would be better devoted to preventing and punishing real crimes that have real victims.

Prohibition represents America's most offensive human rights violation. Of all the nations of the world, the U.S. has the highest percentage of its people in prison, largely because of the government's so-called War on Drugs. (It's really a war on an unpopular group of citizens.)

Prohibition creates an opportunity for government agents to use excessive force and violence in their enforcement efforts.
Lastly, prohibition violates the "Live and Let Live" principle that forms the basis of our moral/ethical code. Stated simply, if I choose to smoke marijuana on my own time and on my own property, it's none of your business, and it's none of the government's business.

That's the end of my list. Notice, please, that I am not advocating unbridled or irresponsible drug use. Drugs should not be made freely and legally available to minors. It should not be legal for people to drive or operate machinery while intoxicated. People should not be absolved of responsibility for their conduct while intoxicated, or for any adverse consequences of their drug use.

I am simply advocating that people be given freedom and responsibility. I'm advocating that we end the government's so-called War on Drugs. I'm advocating that we make responsible drug use legal, and I'm saying that we should start with marijuana.

Donovan Bramwell, a Lewisville farmer who works part-time as a technical writer, is the Libertarian candidate for U.S. Congress, Idaho District 2, running against Republican Mike Simpson and Democrat Craig Williams.

You can visit his web site at: http://www.lp-idaho.org/campaigns/bramwell/index.htm

Source: Idaho State Journal (ID)
Author: Donovan Bramwell
Published: October 27, 2000
Copyright: 2000 Idaho State Journal
Address: PO Box 431, Pocatello ID 83204
Fax: 208-233-8007
Contact: letters@journalnet.com
Website: http://www.journalnet.com/

CannabisNews Justice Archives:
http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/justice.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #10 posted by rash on October 28, 2000 at 16:48:01 PT:

legalize:the spirtual reason?
cannibis has been expressed as a human need. so by
human rights law it should be legalised?. freedom of
expression american law?


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #9 posted by Lehder on October 28, 2000 at 13:51:01 PT
a small correction
It was Johnson who initiated bombing of N. Vietnam against good advice, and Nixon who revealed his "secret plan to end the war" in about March of 1970 by bombing Cambodia, also against all good advice.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #8 posted by Lehder on October 28, 2000 at 13:46:34 PT
The Necessity of Drug Warrior Prosecutions
Thank you, Thomas, for your kind remarks. ( I'm sorry I make a couple editorial errors, but I'm sure no one is confused.)

I wish to emphasize that it is not retribution or vengeance that I am promoting here, although it is often difficult not to wish the very worst for those who have so egregiously, knowingly and willfully diminished our culture, our reputation as a nation, and every one of our lives. I seek prosecution of drug warriors as a preventive measure so that we will never again, as we have for so long, been the victims of ruthless politicians who find it expedient not to lead or enlighten their constituencies, but to manipulate them with ignorant slogans and appeals to thoughtless bigotry. For this behaviour is not leadership. It is an abuse of the public trust that destroys lives, promotes crime, abuses children, makes a mockery of science and reason, and humiliates us in the eyes of the world.

Joe McCarthy fell from power as soon as he appeared on television. After destroying thousands of good people's lives with his vile bigotry, people quickly perceived that his intemperate persecutions were motivated solely by the needs of his own twisted ego and had no proper basis in reality.

There is a good book ( by Hannah Arendt! ), whose title I forget now, which has a chapter called "Lying in Politics". It discusses how time after time throughout our involvement in Vietnam, presidents and congressmen utterly ignored the expert advice of the CIA and the conclusions of many well researched academic studies by both private groups and by government. When Johnson was informed by people who spent their careers studying Vietnam and communism that the war there was unwinnable and that the "domino theory" was nonsense, he proceeded to expand our committment there. When Nixon was told by the CIA that North Vietnam was not sufficiently industrialized to be much affected by bombing, he proceeded with massive daily bombing. Read Hannah's chapter - you'll be amazed by our leaders' contempt for those wiser and more learned than they. And having learned after McCarthy's fall how to control the power of television to manipulate public opinion, our errant leaders brought us a decade long war that ended in our humiliating defeat by a primitive army that was better motivated and better commanded than our own. All the while, every day, the leaders told us on TV the exact opposite of what their own experts - the people whose tax-supported business it is to know - told them. Even secretary of defense McNamara, 30 years after the fact, admitted that he himself knew better yet said nothing. This is not leadership. It is crime.

These pointless wars with invented enemies have now reached the absurd stage of imprisoning more than a million innocent American citizens. This is crime on the grandest scale. If we simply legalize drugs without clearly demonstrating the criminal nature of the war on drugs, then we will have gained very little. Because the government will quickly invent a new "enemy", will identify some new group of harmless people to villify and decimate for an easy profit. This must stop; it's too expensive, too evil, and it Wastes My Time and yours.

Trials for drug warriors would:

1) Send a clear message to politicians that their lofty, conceited sense of a personal morality superior to our own does not qualify them to overide the Constitution or the rights or voice of citizens.

2) Send a clear message to politicians that their lofty, conceited sense of personal character attributes superior to our own does not make them more expert in academic matters than the academicians.

And most importantly,

3) Protracted prosecutions heavily covered by TV would educate the populace as to how they can be victimized and manipulated by the expediences of criminal, ignorant politicians.

Until Americans learn to recognize a totalitarian movement, whatever noble cause or name it may take, for what it is at the outset and are intellectually equipped as a democracy to quash it, we will be victim again and again to similar hateful and destructive movements that will inevitably rise from the fears and unthinking prejudices of unfit leaders.
In short, we need these trials - for the children. Because this war will not be truly won until we, like the Jews, can say "Never Again".


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #7 posted by ras james on October 28, 2000 at 13:00:12 PT
religious freedom
during prohibition the christian churches could use wine (THE BLOOD OF JESUS) for religious purposes...what about the herb? where can the rasta grow the holy herb, the promised "TREE OF LIFE"? where can the hindu sadhu smoke cannabis sativa (THE MIND OF THE CREATOR)? do the american politicians think they can defeat "THE MIND OF GOD"? do the american politicians think they can chop down the ALMIGHTY'S "TREE OF LIFE"? as rasta bob marley sang, "TIME WILL TELL". "SEE THEM FIGHTING FOR POWER FOR THEY KNOW NOT THE HOUR." "I CAN HEAR THE TRUMPETS BLOWING. DON'T KNOW IF IT IS THE FIRST; MIGHT AS WELL BE THE LAST." let the I-man say the last trumpet has blown and the final judgement is: "THE GRACE OF THE LORD JESUS BE WITH THE ALL." lucky for our dumb-corrupt-hypocritical-lying politicians for even they have made the KINGDOOM OF HEAVEN. GIVE ALL PRAISE AND THANKS TO JAH RASTAFARI, KING OF KINGS AND QUEEN OF QUEENS. THE I AND I THAT LIVETH AND REIGNITH IN I AND I, I-TINUALLY



[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #6 posted by freedom fighter on October 28, 2000 at 11:54:43 PT
Saw the show "Freedom"
Man, the show had so many anti-drug ads! www.whatantidrug.com will dump alot of COOKIES! Had to clean my drive up.. This is a warning!!!!



[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #5 posted by Thomas on October 28, 2000 at 10:05:53 PT
P.S.
Calling for retribution against the perps of the drug war is a more threatening suggestion than just calling for a halt to the current policies. On the one hand, the perps will see an end to thier policies, but by calling for retribution, they may actually start to understand that they will be held personally responsible and will face punishment. I believe it is important to call for punishment of the perps along with the calls to stop the drug war.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #4 posted by Thomas on October 28, 2000 at 09:59:43 PT
I'm With Lehder
I agree. Ending the drug war is not enough. I think the perpetrators need to face prosecution as traitors It's that simple. They have shredded the Bill of Rights and they need to be held responsible. Bill McCullom, Clinton, Bush, Gore, McCaffrey, Mica, Hatch, Feinstein, et al.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #3 posted by Lehder on October 28, 2000 at 07:29:06 PT
Another Good Reason
Thanks to truthful information available on the internet and the growing apparence the drug war's destructive and dismal effects everyday, the author's libertarian opinions are becoming mainstream - and, like it or not, they're going to redefine the law. If the government resists this demand for a return of sensibility much longer, then more radical opinions like my own will also become mainstream. I want to see the size and power of the federal government reduced by at least 90%, and I want to imprison the principal legislators and prosecutors of the drug wars for treason and crimes against humanity.

I think it very important that trials of the drug warriors be held and appropriate punishments for their crimes be imposed. In the last half century we have seen at least three times how the scourge of bigotry destroys the lives of children and families and how it devastates society. We began mid-century with McCarthyism, graduated to the war in Vietnam and have now been carrying on the drug war at a high intensity for decades. Each time, Americans have been required by government to swear allegiance to an invented, imaginary enemy. Each time, we have been required, on pain of social condemnation and worse, to give up our time, money and personal security to conform to the government's narrowly defined concept of "politically correct". So simply legalizing drugs and leaving a large repressive bureaucracy and civil war apparatus intact will only allow the government to discover of some new "enemy" that "devastates society" or "threatens our way of life". And we will all be required, in order to be "good Americans", to waste our lives and our money, for the pleasure and profit of government and its army of ignorant bureaucrats. Once again, society will be turned upside down by the din of constant, insipid propaganda as all of us, in fear of our own rulers, swear allegiance to the government's new war against its new "enemy". This must be prevented - for the children. I don't want another generation of children wasted by some expensive and illegal government war against a contrived enemy. I don't want kids forcibly subjected to the blight of sloganeering warpigs in the classroom when they should be learning the marvels of our true culture.

We need trials of drug warriors for crimes against the Constitution. The principle that "following orders" is no excuse was established at Nuremberg. We need to establish the principle in America that, with all the world's resources at our disposal, when the government's own think tanks advise that a course of action is unwise or destructive, then Ignorance is no excuse.

That is what I want to see in order to secure our future against the devastations of ignorance and bigotry. If we can imprison a few tens of thousands of lying drug warriors to make an example of them, to send a clear message to government that the Constitution must be respected by all, then the lives of tens of millions of children whom we save from the scourge of ignorance and the devastations of institutionalized bigotry will have been worth the riddance of a few scumbag enemies of civilization.

So wise up, drug warriors. You're wanted for questioning. And you had better have your answers ready because I'm coming. Simply legalizing drugs, or allowing some large corporation to sell seedless dope, or replacing imprisonment with mandatory "treatment" are not going to satisfy me. They're too little, too late. I want full legalization of all natural products, a sharp reduction in the size and budget of government, an end to government forays into morality, an end to presidents who pray for America but have no intelligence or honor, a release of drug war POWs, reparations for drug war victims, prosecution of drug warriors, and security from government tyranny. I demand Justice.



[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by Ed Carpenter on October 28, 2000 at 06:49:35 PT:

Prohibition
When alcohol was prohibited, it took a Constitutional amendment to allow it. It took another Constitutional amendment to end it when the prohibition was deemed more harmful than the alcohol itself.

Why can the government now prohibit things at will? What happened? What has changed? Get the answer to these and many other questions by getting the Constitution back into government.

When people are elected, they start off by swearing to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. Then they go about trashing it. The Bill of Rights is a joke.

Demand that the Constitution and Bill of Rights be mandatory teaching at all government (public) schools. It isn't mandatory teaching now; it hasn't been for years, and look where this country is as a result.

I can remember when the words "under God" were inserted into the Pledge of Allegiance between "one nation" and "indivisible." That was back in the days when the Lord's prayer was also acceptable, but things change.

Also in the pledge, are the words "and to the Republic for which it stands." Can anybody tell me anything about the Republic? Any volunteers? I didn't think so but don't worry, you're not alone. The students have no clue either.


I teach in a public school, and


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by Doctor Dave on October 27, 2000 at 23:59:32 PT
Brilliant Political Commentary
As Kubby said, "this case is no more about pot than the Boston Tea Party was about tea."

It is about the clear failure of Prohibition on every front: US-financed foreign civil war / farmer invasion
neglect of medical needs of US citizens
criminalization of consensual acts
wasteful spending of $30 billion / year
supression of needed research about medical properties of various substances

The poor brown and black community can't afford to buy political campaigns of rich white lawmakers, so instead the incomes of the rest of the population pays an industry for their oppression.

Think about it.

Doctor Dave

"A nation that makes war on huge numbers of its own people can never truly be free."

http://www.lp.org
http://www.marijuananews.com
http://www.kubby.com


[ Post Comment ]

  Post Comment
Name:       Optional Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on October 27, 2000 at 20:03:16