Cannabis News Marijuana Policy Project
  Marijuana Ingredient Helps Mice Overcome Arthritis
Posted by FoM on July 31, 2000 at 18:55:28 PT
By Richard Saltus, The Boston Globe  
Source: St. Louis Post-Dispatch 

medical An extract of marijuana that does not make users ``high'' blunted the attack of rheumatoid arthritis in mice, scientists are reporting, suggesting a possible new weapon against the crippling disease that affects more than 2 million Americans.

The substance is called cannabidiol, one of about 80 ingredients of marijuana. But it doesn't have any mind-altering properties, making it potentially easier to develop as a drug in today's legal environment, the researchers said.

Snipped


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #7 posted by FoM on August 02, 2000 at 22:21:53 PT:

Joints for Your Joints
Web Posted: August 1, 2000
By Adam Marcus
HealthSCOUT Reporter
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/hl/hsn/?u
Copyright © 2000 Healthscout.com

Monday, July 31 (HealthSCOUT) -- A punchless part of pot could offer arthritis patients a reprieve from their inflamed and painful joints.

British and Israeli researchers say arthritic mice treated with a nonintoxicating component of marijuana showed significant improvement in several key signs of their disease.

The notion that marijuana helps arthritis is far from novel. Indeed, the Chinese recorded the drug's healing properties for rheumatism some 4,000 years ago.

Marijuana contains roughly 80 active chemicals called cannabinoids. Tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC for short, has mind-altering properties that give users their high. Other components, however, appear to have therapeutic powers -- from soothing pain and nausea to calming spastic muscles -- but produce no brain changes.

Although recreational use of pot is illegal in the United States, several states -- including California, Hawaii, Alaska and Oregon -- have laws that permit medical uses of the drug. The federal government, however, staunchly has maintained its opposition to such policies.

Between penal codes and pro-pot advocates lies a cloudy field of science. A 1999 report from the National Academies Institute of Medicine found that cannabinoid drugs, and primarily THC, the active compound in marijuana, may be good for pain relief, control of nausea and vomiting and appetite stimulation.

Other researchers, however, have focused on the drug's downside, which includes the potential to cause head and neck tumors, to damage cells in the lung lining and even to trigger heart attacks.

The latest study, by scientists at Hebrew University in Jerusalem and the Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology in London, tested both injections and oral doses of the cannabinoid CBD in mice with collagen-induced arthritis, a joint disease that mimics human rheumatoid arthritis.

The drug, a precursor of THC, had a Goldilocks effect: Neither small nor large amounts of either form were effective, but a middle dose shielded joints from damage, the researchers say. A report on their findings appears in the latest issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Tests of the animals' lymph fluid showed that the marijuana compound suppressed activity of immune cells and molecules, the researchers say. It also reduced inflammation in joint tissue, particularly by quelling the production of tumor necrosis factor, a potent chemical involved in swelling.

The researchers repeated their study in mice with homologous CIA, a form of recurring arthritis that more closely resembles what humans contract. And again, the marijuana compound showed significant joint protection.

The study suggests that CBD could help arthritis patients "and may be valuable in the treatment of other chronic inflammatory diseases as well," the scientists say.

Dr. John Morgan, a professor of pharmacology at City University of New York Medical School in Manhattan, and an expert in the medical uses of marijuana, says the latest research is neither surprising nor new.

"Both [CBD and THC] have anti-inflammatory properties in some animal systems," he says. But Morgan also cautions that animal studies, including the Israeli work, typically rely on doses far greater than most people take.

Dale Gieringer, coordinator of the California chapter of NORML, a national pro-pot group, says between 10,000 and 20,000 Californians use marijuana medicinally, most for chronic pain linked to cancer, AIDS and arthritis.

http://www.canorml.org/

Yet the true therapeutic potential of marijuana won't be clear until it is studied in a rigorous, scientific manner, Gieringer says. And those studies, at least in the United States, aren't on the horizon.

"We're not really a free country when it comes to drug research," Gieringer says.

Steven Gust, special assistant to the director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, which funds marijuana research, says the idea that the government is squashing pot studies is misguided.

"The fact is that we're not getting requests and we're not getting proposals," Gust says. The National Institutes of Health is sponsoring three trials to test the clinical benefits of the drug, including one in California involving AIDS patients, Gust says.

Morgan, however, says basic marijuana research in this country almost exclusively involves animals, not people. As a result, he says, the best hope for good trials of the therapeutic potential of the drug lies in Europe and Australia, where the scientific climate is more tolerant of the drug.

What To Do:

The only government-approved synthetic marijuana compound is dronabinol, or Marinol, which eases the nausea and pain of cancer treatments.

To read more about the potential medical uses of marijuana, visit the Institute of Medicine, or check out information provided by Harvard University.

http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/marimed/

http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/evidence99/marijuana/Health_Concerns.html

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #6 posted by FoM on August 02, 2000 at 10:22:08 PT
My Feelings
Hi Guys!
Try to think of it this way too. There are over 400 components in Cannabis that I remember reading. What if one of them might cure cancer? That's how I look at research like this.
Peae, FoM!


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #5 posted by dddd on August 02, 2000 at 03:29:28 PT
progress
Well it's nice to see that they are finally figuring out how to get the good stuff out of marijuana,without the side effect of having to experience that annoying stoned feeling.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #4 posted by freedom fighter on August 01, 2000 at 16:15:14 PT
Will Foster
suffered this same kind of diease and was growing approx. 50 clones when he got busted.

I agree with both of you! Althou, I much rather smoke than use a needle.

Maybe the world has this "Mr.Hyde and Dr.Jerkyll Complex".
Think about that for a moment, it seemed that the world think that if you feel good today, you gotta feel bad tomorrow??
Imagine this, Barry McCaffery drank his 3 martinis and got hungover when he said,"Marj. is just a cheech chong drug!"

It is time to free the prisoners and liberate this plant!



[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #3 posted by Dan B on July 31, 2000 at 22:14:45 PT:

Part II
--"Straus highlighted the puzzling finding that the cannabidiol compound was only effective at a narrow range of doses, and said for that reason `it might be difficult to develop (the substance) into a useful anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive drug.'"

Evidence that the best way to administer marijuana for the purpose of alleviating arthritis pain is to smoke it. Smoking offers the most effective means of regulating effective dosage levels. So, you're right, MikeEEEEE (of course). Smoking the herb whole seems like the most logical method of using marijuana to combat arthritis.


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by Dan B on July 31, 2000 at 22:07:45 PT:

Well, yes, but . . .
I'm all for using certain chemicals found in marijuana to ease peoples' suffering, I just don't see why scientists and pols are so keyed up about feeling good after using an effective medicine. Can anyone tell me what is inherently wrong about feeling good? Is there some negative side to euphoria that I am missing?

Aside from that, I hope this derivative drug does bring an end to people's suffering. If they aren't allowed to use cannabis in its most natural form, perhaps they'll at least ease some pain with this derivative.

Of course, the next thing we will learn is that cannabidiol is non-carcinogenic (like the other cannabinoids that have been tested, most notably delta-9 THC) and is thus safe for use by people with arthritis. And they will soon prove that all the other elements of cannabis are not carcinogenic, as well. Eventually, they will have to admit that they have absolutely no grounds for making this drug illegal. Let 'em keep isolating elements of cannabis and proving them effective, yet non-carcinogenic. Soon, they'll prove beyond any shadow of a doubt what we've known all along: this plant, even (perhaps especially) in its most raw form, is not only not harmful, but beneficial--the safest therapeutically-effective substance known to humanity!

Keep on studying, scientists!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by MikeEEEEE on July 31, 2000 at 19:28:18 PT
Playing with nature
This plant was made to be used one way, the whole plant.


[ Post Comment ]

  Post Comment

Name:       Optional Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on July 31, 2000 at 18:55:28