Cannabis News [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  Censorship Gets Derailed
Posted by CN Staff on June 14, 2004 at 14:25:18 PT
Editorial Opinion 
Source: Chicago Tribune  

justice You've heard the phrase "drunk with power"? That pretty well captures the state of mind of Rep. Ernest Istook (R-Okla.) when he pushed through a measure telling the Washington Metro system what kind of ads it could place in its stations, trains and buses. And in a nice bit of symmetry, his mandate dealt with a different kind of intoxicant.

Istook, who chairs the House subcommittee responsible for funding of mass transit, was outraged one day last year when he saw ads at Metro stops with a photo of a couple embracing and the message, "Enjoy better sex! Legalize and tax marijuana."

He introduced legislation forbidding any transit system that gets federal funds from allowing "any activity that promotes the legalization or medical use" of marijuana or other illicit drugs, and it passed.

A group called Change the Climate tried to buy space from the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority for ads that featured the headline, "Marijuana Laws Waste Billions of Taxpayer Dollars to Lock Up Non-Violent Americans." Citing the new federal ban, the WMATA said it was obliged to reject the ads rather than risk losing the $170 million it gets each year in federal money. One point of view could be expressed on the subways and buses of the nation's capital--and one only.

But a federal district court has done the inevitable, striking down the ban as an unconstitutional attack on freedom of speech. The Metro system has made a practice of accepting issue-oriented ads, the court said, and the government may not choose which opinions shall be allowed.

"While Congress may be under no obligation to fund mass transit or other entities that rely also on advertising revenues for their survival, once it chooses to do so, it must act in a way that does not engage in viewpoint discrimination in violation of the 1st Amendment," wrote Judge Paul L. Friedman. There's something fundamentally wrong with a policy that lets one side spread its message while forcibly silencing the other side.

But Istook still doesn't get it. After the decision came down, he said, "I'm confident that ultimately the courts will agree with the long-standing principle that Congress is free to decide what we will or will not fund. We provide major funding to combat drug use, and tax dollars should not be used to subsidize contrary messages."

What is he talking about? Running the notices would not have "subsidized" an unapproved message: Change the Climate was trying to buy ad space, at a total price of $91,875.

Congress is free to decide whether to fund mass transit or not. What it's not free to do is use its power of the purse to suppress one point of view on a matter of public policy. Direct government censorship is forbidden by the 1st Amendment, and so is the indirect kind.

It's understandable that Istook takes issue with the policies proposed by Change the Climate and its allies. But if he thinks it would be a mistake to liberalize drug laws, he should use the option he's trying to deny them: Rebut their arguments.

Source: Chicago Tribune (IL)
Published: June 14, 2004
Copyright: 2004 Chicago Tribune Company
Contact: ctc-TribLetter@Tribune.com
Website: http://www.chicagotribune.com/

Related Articles & Web Sites:

MPP: http://www.mpp.org/
ACLU: http://www.aclu.org/
DPA: http://www.drugpolicy.org/
CTC: http://www.changetheclimate.org/

Ads in Favor of Legalizing Drugs OKd
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread18942.shtml

Judge Voids Law Against Drug Ads On Metro
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread18941.shtml

Railroaded Speech - San Francisco Chronicle
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread18790.shtml

Judge: Ad Restrictions Unconstitutional
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread18940.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #8 posted by afterburner on October 17, 2004 at 09:36:35 PT
Guantanamo Foreshadowed Abu Ghraib?
Staff detail abuse at Guantanamo Oct. 17, 2004. 08:16 AM [Toronto Star]

' Many detainees at Guantanamo Bay were regularly subjected to harsh and coercive treatment, according to officials who worked at the prison facility at the U.S. naval base in Cuba. Military guards, intelligence agents and others described in recent interviews a range of abusive interrogation procedures they said occurred over a long period of time. ' [Full Story] http://tinyurl.com/6h4g7

Your Drug War training and tax dollars at work. The link between the treatment of US Drug War prisoners and the treatment of Abu Ghraib prisoners by the "actions of a few" isolated misfits in US service or contractors has been previously discussed. Meanwhile, the Guantanamo prisoners, being held as "enemy combatants" without benefit of the Geneva Conventions and standard legal protections, have fallen into a black hole of public indifference.

A bully is a bully is a bully. The War on some Drugs has authorized federal agents and judges to bully peaceful citizens of the cannabis culture. Then, the doctrine of pre-emption allows the US to bully other sovereign nations. The "American Dream" is turning into a global nightmare, based on government-sanctioned fear-mongering.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #7 posted by afterburner on June 14, 2004 at 21:59:57 PT
Just Say No???
Pills vs. Talking: When It Comes to Mental Illness, Parents Face Dilemmas Over Medication, Talk Therapy By Bryan Robinson http://abcnews.go.com/sections/Living/US/mental_illness_treatment_kids_040607-1.html June 7, 2004 — " When Chad Taylor noticed his son was apparently experiencing serious side effects from Ritalin prescribed for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, he decided to take the boy off the medication. Now, he says he may be accused of child abuse. "

Just Say No?

Top Story: It’s The Stupidity, Stupid. How the Prohibitionist Ideology Has Wrecked The Republican Party and Undermined Democracy Everywhere. When Ideology Trumps Reality, The Result is Stupidity. Posted by Richard Cowan on June 13, 2004 http://www.marijuananews.com/news.php3?sid=749

' The Los Angeles Times reported today, “Some officers believe that alcohol may have been a factor in the behavior of guards (at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq) who have been charged with beating prisoners, stripping them naked, forcing them to masturbate and stacking them in pyramid-shaped piles on the prison floor. At least one prisoner has told investigators that he frequently smelled alcohol on the guards' breath in the cellblock where most of the abuses occurred.” '

' As the report from Portugal demonstrates, the police on the front lines know what the real “drug problem” is. And so does the Pentagon, for that matter. '

Just Say No?



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by cloud7 on June 14, 2004 at 21:44:22 PT
LOL
If anyone still believes the DEA is an ANTI drug organization, check out their webpage with a *detailed* description on how to produce heroin from opium poppies (as a resource for LEO's only of course).

http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/intel/20026/20026.html

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #5 posted by gloovins on June 14, 2004 at 19:14:16 PT
Or is it...?
Istook-an idiot to piss on further...ahh I give up.

He is an idiot, how's that? cool...wow i'm frazzled but, alas I vent here, & therefore I am no longer frazzled.

I must now go and feast on fruit juice.

JAH live....

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #4 posted by gloovins on June 14, 2004 at 19:08:14 PT
you know what?
Istook-a idiot to try to piss on further Americans 1st amendment rights.

Yes, it did. People of Oklahoma wake up! Istook is kook!

(does that rhyme?)

hold on I'll go ask Lenny Kravitz .... ;)

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by mayan on June 14, 2004 at 16:11:44 PT
Another Fascist Exposed!
Boy, this story is sure getting around! I bet Istook wishes he'd never pushed his anti-free speech legislation in the first place. Change the Climate has made him look incredibly stupid! Another fascist exposed!!!

The way out is the way in...

Kean and failure on 9/11: http://www.911citizenswatch.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=297&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

Lions Gate and IFC Fighting 'R' Rating for "Fahrenheit 9/11" http://www.indiewire.com/biz/biz_040614fahr.html Teens banned from Moore film: http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,9846681%5E1702,00.html

Man who chaired CA recall tries to prevent showing of 9/11 film: http://www.rawstory.com/exclusives/byrne/move_america_forward_blocks_911_Moore_film.htm

Film and Election Politics Cross in 'Fahrenheit 9/11' http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0611-02.htm

The Desperate Censors - Republicans Behind Attack on Fahrenheit 9/11: http://www.counterpunch.org/nimmo06142004.html



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by FoM on June 14, 2004 at 15:23:51 PT
News Brief from UPI
Lenny Kravitz: I Smoked Pot with Jagger

Zagreb, Croatia, Jun. 14 (UPI) -- U.S. rocker Lenny Kravitz says he kept the remains of a marijuana cigarette he once smoked with Mick Jagger out of respect for the British rocker.

Kravitz, on tour in Croatia, said he deemed it a great privilege when the leader of the Rolling Stones offered to share some pot with him, Gloria magazine reported.

"We were performing on the same stage once, and he invited me to go to his place afterwards," Kravitz said. "We talked the entire night and smoked marijuana. We shared a joint, and I kept the rest of it for almost a year. It was a sign of respect."

As a result, Kravitz kept the butt of the joint as a tribute for 12 months, after which he decided to smoke the rest of it.

"At one point I had no grass at home," he said, "so I smoked the rest of the joint I shared with Jagger."



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by Virgil on June 14, 2004 at 15:00:28 PT
Rebut their arguments
Go ahead rebut the fact that CP should end because it is unjust, a failure, and harmful. Tell us that what we consume is not an unalienable right and tell us that we did not once fight a revolution for unalienable rights.

Someone is asking a question about Marinol at http://tinyurl.com/3fj3j It is a display of ignorance considering that the most important fact in all of CP is that synthetic THC under the trademark name, Marinol, is legal as a Schedule 3 drug when its identical molecule from nature is considered to have no medical value, be addictive, and dangerous even under a doctor's supervision. The expansion of that fact would say that whole extracts would almost always be superior to one isolated cannabinoid and that the best path for clinical cannabis is to accumulate knowledge and research with the release of GW extracts and those that follow so that the best (cannabinoidal or cannabinoidial- damned silene plan is hurting spelling and vocabulary) combination. Then there is the fact that the greatest value of cannabis is that it can be free if it were free.

Someone needs to straighten those people out in that thread, but it will not be me. Who could ever fill all the holes of ignorance, one by one?

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on June 14, 2004 at 14:25:18